Lets hope for this and do our best to make it reality.

What is so romantic about living without a specific name? I don't see how this could be cool. I mean having anonymity ok. But I think it is fine in the digital world. In the?real world integrity is nothing bad in my view.

And how would you defend in the new utopia from the big coorporations? They can fund their military anyways. Only small people need stata sponsored Police. The rich would in every escenario without state be much more powerful, since this is just the way any good monarchy was working or is still working today.

So you thing the best pacifist is heavyly armed? Or you just consider armed streetcrime to be normal?

I thought of the legitimation of state power a lot in the last weeks.

One strong point is that the police works under the law. And when they do not behave according to the law a court has to possibility to bring them to the court and into prison for their illegal acts as anyone else too.

A just police corp always ever react, since all citizen need to be seen as innocent until there is proof against it. This means Police legitimized by human rights can never act preventive.

And when we already know that someone needs to have the most power. Why shouldn't it be legitimized by democratic rules?

This would be great when all small minigovernments of small groups would start existing. Small communes that selfgovern and interact with other communities freely. But up to now I do not have a concept how they could free themselves from the current nation state, since every piece of land in this earth belongs currently to a nation state.

I would state, the more things you can appriciate the richer you are!

What are things you appriciate?

Slow often is good. Since what are good rules today probably also are in 1000 years. But I also think that representative democracy could may in this decade becoma obsolete when there are good working evoting systems. Then Democracies should be possible where every person can vote about every single law. So every law has direct legitimacy in majorities.

It is important to keep up utopia. I just recently heard a great talk of a european politician. There he asks the crowd:

Who buys a ticket to enter the train?

Who would still buy the ticket if you are sure today there is no one controling anyone for tickets with a 100% certainty?

This second train is a democracy without transparency. Maby there would still be narcist in the politics when there is transparency. But at least the voters have the full data for what they are voting for.

Says the commercial of the meat industry.

World health organisation is voting for no more then two meals a week should be meat to be healthy.

I am strongly against the fact that gov has direct point on this. Maby Politicians get incentivised to support big food companies. But then Politicians are only the tool. But the real bad guys are the big companies. And the laws that let them pay politicians without transparency. We need a big wave of transparency laws for democracies to work. How is our voting system free if we do not know who is paying?

I think there need to be more transparency about politicians income. Every dollar needs to be publicly declared, where it is coming from. And if it is not clear it should go in the taxes directly.

The fact, twitter needs to produce higher income and is therefore pressured to sell views and attention.

I share the fact, that many are unfit and something is wrong. But I would say it is politicians, who are unable to prohibit high sugar baverage in schools.

The inability to just ban health threats. Since the market is obviously not solving it, rules have to.

What did you write about in the disappearing post?

Sounds very sad. I wish you good luck in hearing your name more often bro 😜🤠

You can do this. Don't let you lead by your fear. But rather by your sheer will ❤️‍🔥

And start thinking yourself instead of just post every bullshit no matter if you understand it or not, but most important it pleases your actions...

In general the only possible way is to look for abonnement-bound media. In one way or the other journalist need to gain some money to continue their work as well.

Great speech. So lets go for it. Post cases of such cases, where the justice system fails to picture the scale and through transparancy improve step by step.

Eine Frage an Personen, welche Steuern als Diebstahl betrachten:

Seht ihr Bildung als Menschenrecht oder als ein Privileg von Wohlhabenden?

Ist ein demokratisch legitimiertes Justizsystem in deinen Augen unnötig?

Ist dir eine freie Presse mit professionellen Journalisten wichtig?

Deepl translation:

A question for people who see taxes as theft:

Do you see education as a human right or as a privilege of the wealthy?

Is a democratically legitimized judicial system unnecessary in your eyes?

Is a free press with professional journalists important to you?