Ok good, glad you clarified that. You’re the owner and *just* paid royalties to dmnyc, which fittingly was equal to the final sale cost
Wait, you paid it? Now it means you don’t own it any more
You know that will only be valid if BTCapsule pays it
Was that because of the burning desire to be enlightened or the OP’s pfp?
I’m scared to go into this thread now
💯 love what you’re doing and also getting plebs to follow your lead
Gigi needs to update his seminal work. The title should now read: Merrcurr is Time
And most importantly, when a group of true maxis get together in person, it’s the happiest and most hopeful place on earth
I think Alex was referring to the SEC simps who’re begging for ETH regulation
I can’t believe I didn’t see this earlier. This is profound
I felt there was something off about today. It’s a fine day, but it seemed like some small but important thing was missing. Then I remembered - #[0] didn’t say the thing
Need to convert the remaining 1%
These conversations always end this way:
Me: Your NFT and smart contract governing it don’t supersede jurisdictional contract law
NFToooor: yeah, but we’re building a world where the constitution is itself a smart contract
Yeah, but I want to hear it from a true believer, not you!
My skepticism stems from people (not you, necessarily) inserting a blockchain and token wherever possible, when the same problem can be solved in a far more cost and compute efficient manner. That plus my original view that a certificate of ownership for a digital image doesn’t make sense (because of 100% fidelity infinite replication)
The artists are better off using a central marketplace that issues certificates of authenticity. They don’t need a blockchain. That way they don’t take the risk of holding xtz. Tezos is not decentralized by any stretch of imagination and there is no guarantee that the certificates will last forever
Not if the chain gets re-organized
And Peter, we haven’t even got to talking about tech risks here. The certificates of authenticity are ruggable, especially on a shitcoin chain like Tezos, with its delegated-PoS consensus that highly prone to baker centralization
NFT’s created an incredibly loose and flexible definition of ownership that we Bitcoiners are pushing back against. Only I incontrovertibly own the utxos in my hw wallet and only I can enjoy 100% of the benefits of that ownership. It’s not the case with digital art NFTs. As a right-click-saver of NFTs, I certainly get to enjoy some of the same benefits the “owner” of that NFT does. The only benefit the “owner” has is being able to sell or transfer the certificate of authenticity on a marketplace where participants accept that type of transaction as valid.
Yes, someone posted the man-in-the-mirror meme of that a couple of days ago. Goes to show that we should go down the rabbit hole, but not through the looking glass
There’s also the distinct possibility that Nostr.build can rug you by deleting image 2008.jpg 😂
Uhhhhh, does he mean this one?!? Besides below, pretty sure I’ve seen some others posting 2008.jpeg…
Yeah, but none of those can ever be image # 2008.jpg on Nostr.build
Looks like #[6] got a serious security upgrade 👀
It certainly is. Approaching Mona Lisa levels #[5] must be thrilled as the owner
