I’ve spent all week on this and I can honestly say this is working so damn well that I think this might be the feature that changes everything. EVERYTHING. Zaps now feel exactly like reactions with the satisfying haptic feedback. The psychology and UX of this is profound. Its crazy all the things happening under the hood to make this work and yet it just does. So pumped to release this. nostr:note1haeux75ceuq6qr5zmldvdr4snz599pmfplgu76ta9nf3748upqmqdcuv29

Any problems with 12 word seed phrases compared to 24, besides slightly less secure?

#onlyzaps

5 second delay for zap cancel opportunity -> fetch lightning invoice from users lightning address -> send invoice to NWC relay for payment -> nwc pay confirmation -> n second delay -> zap appears …

I realize none of this really needs to be shown to the user. When you click the zap button, it just becomes a placeholder that tracks all this progress and state internally, but otherwise shows immediate zap success. Most of the time it will succeed, in the instances it doesn’t the zap just goes away and you can retry if you want, but its not the end of the world. The biggest thing is the instant haptic feedback on zap that will tend to work 99% of the time anyways. I’m not even going to show a different color I don’t think, you can inspect the zaps in the zap list to see if its still pending, but its a detail users rarely need to care about

AirZap ? nostr:note1zjcf2plx65ruv3g672uqk0enay90xu4249fqzymp2uxzkehcjxjqrrch9x

Either you fight for all of humanity or you enable a few to rule all of humanity.

to be fair, some mobile nostr clients don’t check the signature of every note before presenting it. I don’t really have a hard opinion on if that is necessary.

the mastadon guy is offering this same critique about the bluesky app… but instead of the dev saying “we don’t believe it’s necessary, to much for mobile” or “correct it doesn’t do that yet” he takes this shorting of crypto which in that sentence, to me it’s pretty clear he ain’t talking about coin, and Paul responds with “it doesn’t use crypto in the coin sense”.

it’s a dunk on someone who’s just being a little ranty and playful in analysis of the differences between the protocols.

It just sucks cause I’d like to see what Paul’s saying about the development of the protocol.

On nostr I probably wouldn’t of I tagged Paul and just replied the guy quoting him, but replying to: module doesn’t exist yet there.

Does anyone here ever actually get to the end of their podcast queue?

💁‍♀️

1 what I said

2 what was blatantly misinterpreted to “dunk”

3 who blocked me for pointing it out