How do social media communities face adversity?

Can they?

#asknostr

Yesterday I made my first Final Table in a live poker tournament. I’m happy 😊

Cheers to me!

Let's go! Followed

It’s going up forever 👀

I visited my godmother today, whom I've not seen in 10+ years.

She's a spicy old lady. Metaphorically, we spoke the same language, I was thinking to myself, well, heck when did you go down the #BTC rabbit hole?!

Except her rabbit hole was converting from Catholicism to Jahova Witness.

All parts of her conversation were exactly what you might hear on nostr or #btc twitter. Except, it's Jahovah witness and not an orange protocol.

Let that sink in a bit.

#RandomThoughts

Where are my nostr wrestlers and jiujitsu people at?

#nature #photography #treestr #photostr #art #artstr #grownstr

Several bi-partisan orgs are pushing for this including Satoshi Action Fund, Bitcoin policy institute, and digital chamber of commerce. Human rights orgs and booking and speaking with congressional offices. Citizens write to and speak with their representatives at the state and federal level. Truth is we need billions of dollars pouring into nonprofit and lobbying orgs dedicated to educating lawmakers and marketing the importance of these issues to citizens/voters. Legal groups need to advocate for better legislation and push back on authoritative ones, like coin center, although they need more funding and we need more orgs like them.

Bitcoin will continue to do its thing regardless, but would be great if we had laws and policy supporting the free and open use of citizens to fully engage with Bitcoin as they wish

Several bi-partisan orgs are pushing for this including Satoshi Action Fund, Bitcoin policy institute, and digital chamber of commerce. Human rights orgs and booking and speaking with congressional offices. Citizens write to and speak with their representatives at the state and federal level. Truth is we need billions of dollars pouring into nonprofit and lobbying orgs dedicated to educating lawmakers and marketing the importance of these issues to citizens/voters. Legal groups need to advocate for better legislation and push back on authoritative ones, like coin center, although they need more funding and we need more orgs like them.

Bitcoin will continue to do its thing regardless, but would be great if we had laws and policy supporting the free and open use of citizens to fully engage with Bitcoin as they wish

Whether you care or not, it is beneficial to bitcoin and bitcoiners around the world to have more protections for bitcoin as a medium of exchange, privacy and self-custody baked into U.S. law (in addition to bill or rights and constitution that we *think* should be interpreted to protect this).

That involves lobbying with and holding lawmakers accountable, in a bi-partisan way. Congress must act, and this is much more important than even who is president in terms of bitcoin advocacy. Of course, close second is the executive branch and treasury, CFTC, and SEC.

I don’t think it’s beneficial to anyone to drive more partisan division by trying to invest in someone’s campaign who is purely self-motivated, flips against anyone and anything on a dime, and doesn’t give a damn about rights, but rather their own shitcoin collection (re. David Bailey supporting Trump’s campaign).

I focus a lot on Dem and progressives lawmakers because that’s my thing (and I’m a progressive and know them and their motivations well), and more of them are against bitcoin than the other side, regardless of the reason. We should approach bitcoin and advocacy in the U.S. as holding ALL lawmakers accountable and standing up for our rights, not requesting them or cheerleading for a political candidate who says crypto good purely because the other side says crypto bad. It makes us look like idiots.

Whether you care or not, it is beneficial to bitcoin and bitcoiners around the world to have more protections for bitcoin as a medium of exchange, privacy and self-custody baked into U.S. law (in addition to bill or rights and constitution that we *think* should be interpreted to protect this).

That involves lobbying with and holding lawmakers accountable, in a bi-partisan way. Congress must act, and this is much more important than even who is president in terms of bitcoin advocacy. Of course, close second is the executive branch and treasury, CFTC, and SEC.

I don’t think it’s beneficial to anyone to drive more partisan division by trying to invest in someone’s campaign who is purely self-motivated, flips against anyone and anything on a dime, and doesn’t give a damn about rights, but rather their own shitcoin collection (re. David Bailey supporting Trump’s campaign).

I focus a lot on Dem and progressives lawmakers because that’s my thing (and I’m a progressive and know them and their motivations well), and more of them are against bitcoin than the other side, regardless of the reason. We should approach bitcoin and advocacy in the U.S. as holding ALL lawmakers accountable and standing up for our rights, not requesting them or cheerleading for a political candidate who says crypto good purely because the other side says crypto bad. It makes us look like idiots.

All these folks seeing aurora and all I got is the Big Dipper. Lol

Twitter has devolved into a Conservative right wing, and liberal far left wing echo chamber of political slaves and statist minded fools.

Worshiping a politician because TV news told you to must be all the fun you get.

If someone is offended by this post, then they are extremely easy to offend.

Normalize being allergic to seed oils

Lunch. Farmers Market Polish Sausage and pasture raised egg scramble. #foodstr

Hear me out. Bitcoin summer camp at Susie’s house. 😂 nostr:note1u7e00yvqkllmge8ycahaqn99x89easa9xu34vx5ju0tfgkavaphslxa9ek