I feel like most people put altcoins and shitcoins in the same category.
Incredibly sad…Governments always win. Citizens always lose. nostr:note1jmnkcmny7tg8wnqfklz8w4tn3vnnhgqx4wekuz8he7awd27355asqrrpkm
You can’t unsee it once you see it.
Ha! I am not one who stacks sats. It was more for the followers who do.
Your life is not measured by the amount of sats you stack.
Ha! You just hand the gold brick to your mate standing right beside you. It could exchange must faster than the lightning network. That’s a piss poor example of #gold vs. #bitcoin.
Billions have been made of the backs of open source developers. I don’t think #bitcoin is going to change that.
Gary is has been doing some thinking. Here he is in another video.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rwJVbYEzyDQ&list=PLFXuj8LdPB25f3CBedmimkpSS9LHD3N9H&index=7&pp=iAQB
If you have to subsidize someone to purchase something that they otherwise wouldn’t purchase. If I have to financially convince you to convince you. You haven’t really convinced me. You have manipulated me to purchase.
If you need subsidies from the government to make a good idea of work…it’s not a good idea.
About 68k per kilo. But that doesn’t include verification. And you don’t have to verify, but you run the risk of it being fake in doing so.
I would think it’s the value of one coin. Because verification and transport is inherently in the product, so premium is inherently in the product. You can’t separate any of those from the product.
That’s your argument? Do you know how expensive one bitcoin is to own, verify, and transport?
Why are you even on Twitter? Because it doesn’t make financial sense yet to leave Twitter? So whose is chasing fiat?






