Avatar
Powermeat
c160a6cfb38c7d623b880ceb2dab820edb0f23248109bcd32e2a34d39146a795
1 sat = 1 sat Vires in Numeris

Sort by % markup and pick the cheapest that has your preferred method for payment. They all have the same likelyhood of scam.. which is pretty damn near 0. With their escrow, I can't figure out how someone could scam

Replying to Avatar jb55

thankful for spooks in canada and nostr:npub1utx00neqgqln72j22kej3ux7803c2k986henvvha4thuwfkper4s7r50e8 for reminding me of the importance of non-kyc lightning apps such as #robosats. Decided to ditch shakepay today and will be focusing no-kyc exchanges only. The ux in these apps are pretty rough. Looking forward to contributing to these when I can.

I would love a native client for robosats, bonus with an order book backed by nostr. So much work to be done here.

nostr:npub1vtlqystr2056cqvuy8uehq5g757362029krqv5axw6gdw37kunkq7ajrhd has something pretty far along for no kyc robosats over nostr

Fiat #ordinals

Put in 51 cents, get back 1 cent with a pic on it

I lost some relays and had to add a few back to even make this post

Is it just me or are a ton of #relays down?

#asknostr #nostr #relay

https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/commit/a9f7058659171d8f4a0f788751a39ad78b95f557

I guess this isn't nip-86 yet but it looks like it would work for paywalled content. people without the shared key would see encrypted data or nothing at all... better would be to make it so they could see how to decrypt it

Click it when there's a website I want to share

Replying to Avatar hodlbod

Just drafted a couple new nips for private groups (rebranded as "closed communities"). I'd love your thoughts:

https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/875

The goal is to introduce as few new concepts as possible, instead composing existing functionality together (kind 30000 for member lists, and building on nip 72 communities). The benefit of this is that we now get hybrid communities, which can be partially public and partially private, which could have some interesting use cases.

or maybe nip 86 alone would be better. Paid subscribers have the current shared key and others see the option to zap to get access

Replying to Avatar hodlbod

Just drafted a couple new nips for private groups (rebranded as "closed communities"). I'd love your thoughts:

https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/875

The goal is to introduce as few new concepts as possible, instead composing existing functionality together (kind 30000 for member lists, and building on nip 72 communities). The benefit of this is that we now get hybrid communities, which can be partially public and partially private, which could have some interesting use cases.

Would this allow for paywalled content to be published?