Bitcoin Core merged two proposal important:

- BIP-324: introduce features as opportunistic encryption, a mild bandwidth reduction and more

- AssumeUTXO: Verify old timechain history until after the user is able to receive recent transactions

Sources:

- PR (BIP-324): https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/28331

- PR (AssumeUTXO): https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/27596

#bitcoin

PeachBitcoin

https://graduallythensuddenly.xyz/pay-me-in-bitcoin-theory/

https://github.com/MutinyWallet/bitcoin-waila/releases/tag/v0.2.3

https://github.com/pool2win/bitcoin-contracts-tlaplus

https://github.com/payjoin/rust-payjoin/releases/tag/payjoin-0.10.0

https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1500

https://github.com/halseth/mattlab/blob/main/docs/challenge.md

https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2023-September/021974.html

https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/the-unsuitability-of-presigned-transactions-for-vaults/113

https://mailmanlists.org/pipermail/dlc-dev/2023-September/000177.html

😁 https://github.com/CoinjoinsOrg/coinjoins/issues/40

https://bitcoincore.reviews/28107

*BIP

https://stacker.news/items/269532

Now on Bitcoin Core, we’ve two possible soft forks! Covenants tools and BP-300. Well, the games begin

Yes

Make sense

Is it just me or are Bitcoin-only VCs supporting more KYC initiatives than non-KYC?