I don't agree that "life without intoxicants is so painfully boring." I'm almost never bored, except when waiting at the DMV, sitting through a lecture on the benefits of "diversity," or having a 100-IQ nurse tell me that vaccines are "safe and effective."
I doubt that Bitcoin is anti-technological, though it may well put an end to the more wasteful aspects of finance-capitalism. It is of course counter-Semitic in that it has the potential to take away one of the Jewish power structure's main sources of funding -- the ability to create money out of nothing.
Bitcoin is definitely anti-finance-capitalism and anti-waste. When your money is brought into existence without the need to constantly pay interest on it, the toxic "we need growth, growth, growth all the time" attitude can be seen for the social poison that it is. And when your currency is always increasing in purchasing power, there is no desire to spend, spend, spend, and spend quickly -- instead, this is replaced by a desire to only spend when it is really necessary or extremely beneficial.
Wow, I made it onto an inspirational quote site: https://quotefancy.com/quote/2737555/Kevin-Alfred-Strom-To-learn-who-rules-over-you-simply-find-out-who-you-are-not-allowed-to
The government of Great Britain is now the enemy of its own people (and has been for nearly a century; it's just more obvious now). It is long past time for it to be totally replaced.
In 1994 the Communist California Judiciary betrayed the will of the voting citizenry.
They nullified Proposition 187, which would have helped protect the public from the invading Illegal Alien horde Thirty-Years ago.
Our usurpers are the enemy, now they DEI our Juries too...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1994_California_Proposition_187
No jury, no judge, no law, no official, no constitution, and no majority should ever prevent a man from doing what is right for his family and his Folk.
Yes, it's the 98% that make the 2% look bad.
Attraction cannot be negotiated. You cannot reason with it.
Women are attracted to men with visible capacity for violence.
This is not negotiable. For thousands upon thousands of generations, men without the capacity for violence were not a good bet, personally or genetically.
Evolution.
Women cannot sustain attraction to placid, docile, safe men, any more than you can get it up for fat dumpy women.
So, if we, collectively, create a society, create a civilization with a social ethos, where our definition of a good man does not include the capacity for violence, then women will mate with thugs and abusers.
It's not their fault. Their ovaries demand hunters and warriors.
A good guy is nice to have, but violence is necessary. So a woman can only be attracted to good guys in a society where a guy can be both good and violent.
For thousands of years, we had this. We had a notion that we were a group, a tribe, a team... that we were something which could be called "we".
And that our tribe had members, and friends, and enemies.
And that willingness to commit violence to our enemies was a virtue.
So a man could easily be both good and violent.
Then our enemies infected an entire generation of our youth with a mind virus.
It was designed by the KGB, an organization whose real main function was not espionage but propaganda, and it was intended to pave the way for communism.
It has mutated many times in the wild, since then, and would not be anything recognizable or useful to its Soviet creators.
But it still functions to destabilize Western civilization.
We call it the Woke Mind Virus.
One of its major demands, in those it infects, is that we treat all of humanity as our tribe, regardless of how they regard or treat us. It demands we care, preferentially, not for our own poor and sick, but for the poor and sick of the Sudan, and Colombia, and Bangladesh.
It demands we behave as if we have no enemies, only a duty of care towards literally everyone.
This transforms the societal attitude towards violence. Violence ceases to be seen as what it really is, a tool with an important purpose, and starts to be seen as an evil to prevent at all costs, never to be aimed at the open and avowed enemies of our tribe, but only at those among our own who oppose this unilateral and suicidal assumption of universal human brotherhood.
When the infection becomes advanced enough, there is no longer an overlap between the good man and the violent man. So women's ovaries, demanding violence, will seek out evil men.
A woman will happily bear the children of an evil man if a weak man is the only other option.
What must we do?
We must admit to ourselves that the counterculture movement of the 60s, and everything that followed from it, was not just a mistake with disastrous consequences, but a weaponized Soviet psyop.
And we must physically remove any element of its influence from our nation.
https://xcancel.com/Devon_Eriksen_/status/1886790819195113982#m
All of this is basically true. But it places the blame on the KGB, which is pretty ludicrous, instead of where it belongs: on the Jewish power structure (which created the NKVD/KGB).
Attraction cannot be negotiated. You cannot reason with it.
Women are attracted to men with visible capacity for violence.
This is not negotiable. For thousands upon thousands of generations, men without the capacity for violence were not a good bet, personally or genetically.
Evolution.
Women cannot sustain attraction to placid, docile, safe men, any more than you can get it up for fat dumpy women.
So, if we, collectively, create a society, create a civilization with a social ethos, where our definition of a good man does not include the capacity for violence, then women will mate with thugs and abusers.
It's not their fault. Their ovaries demand hunters and warriors.
A good guy is nice to have, but violence is necessary. So a woman can only be attracted to good guys in a society where a guy can be both good and violent.
For thousands of years, we had this. We had a notion that we were a group, a tribe, a team... that we were something which could be called "we".
And that our tribe had members, and friends, and enemies.
And that willingness to commit violence to our enemies was a virtue.
So a man could easily be both good and violent.
Then our enemies infected an entire generation of our youth with a mind virus.
It was designed by the KGB, an organization whose real main function was not espionage but propaganda, and it was intended to pave the way for communism.
It has mutated many times in the wild, since then, and would not be anything recognizable or useful to its Soviet creators.
But it still functions to destabilize Western civilization.
We call it the Woke Mind Virus.
One of its major demands, in those it infects, is that we treat all of humanity as our tribe, regardless of how they regard or treat us. It demands we care, preferentially, not for our own poor and sick, but for the poor and sick of the Sudan, and Colombia, and Bangladesh.
It demands we behave as if we have no enemies, only a duty of care towards literally everyone.
This transforms the societal attitude towards violence. Violence ceases to be seen as what it really is, a tool with an important purpose, and starts to be seen as an evil to prevent at all costs, never to be aimed at the open and avowed enemies of our tribe, but only at those among our own who oppose this unilateral and suicidal assumption of universal human brotherhood.
When the infection becomes advanced enough, there is no longer an overlap between the good man and the violent man. So women's ovaries, demanding violence, will seek out evil men.
A woman will happily bear the children of an evil man if a weak man is the only other option.
What must we do?
We must admit to ourselves that the counterculture movement of the 60s, and everything that followed from it, was not just a mistake with disastrous consequences, but a weaponized Soviet psyop.
And we must physically remove any element of its influence from our nation.
https://xcancel.com/Devon_Eriksen_/status/1886790819195113982#m
All of this is basically true. But it places the blame on the KGB, which is pretty ludicrous, instead of where it belongs: on the Jewish power structure (which created the NKVD/KGB).
The Maoris are clearly healthier than White people in certain ways. We need to heal ourselves of the sickness that has contaminated our souls.
I have pretty much quit consuming all refined oils, so olive oil is out of the picture, too.
Here in the US, I am more concerned with things other than language in the schools. 1) Is the school all-White? If not, my children will not attend. 2) Does the school teach that "alternate" sexualities are acceptable? If so, my children will not attend. 3) Does the school teach that multiracialism is a good thing? If so, my children will not attend. 4) Does the school teach that the good side won World War 2, and that Jews had a special victim status in that war? If so, my children will not attend.
Good fiction is anything by Raymond Chandler.
Actually, as far as I am concerned, bugs ARE a kind of meat, something I haven't eaten for decades.
Everything you say about Maduro may indeed be true, but installing a Zionist lapdog for Washington and Tel Aviv and their banker friends would not be an improvement. Best of good fortune to you and your people.
Plenty of Palestinians are Christians, and a few are racially White. But, as it's race that matters, not religion (you can change your religion twice a day if you want to), only those who are racially White should be brought to our nations. I do sympathize with all of them, though, and hope they totally and permanently defeat the monster that is trying to annihilate them.
A friend asked me why there is so much advertising for General Motors on NOSTR.
I have no love for Putin, but my lived experience is that if John Bolton likes something, it must be bad -- and if John Bolton hates something, it must be good.