What are the chances that you use custodian solution where all txns are internal db updates and call that lightning?
nostr:npub1chxa2um7gl65ymyaagjrqys39mtzlwnm2drcs6qkqmme7k4edq4qghrjdd Don't we have coin control in sbw?
Apparently this has been sent to me 6 days ago but I only got it now.
Luckily I care very little about wallet users and their questions but overall this is a social network simply failing at its job.
A bunch of retards called nostr developers, can you finally get your shit together and make it work?
nostr:note1ckdpdelgj37r7sgvxey4wuejkjta9qkg8sh66kumgh5j8jmr40vq20xmv7
sorry I'm just too drunk atm to understand such an elaborate prose so that was my knee jerk response
I it's a way to do custody, there's really no need to invent stuff like "LN node sharing".
share LN nodes in a privacy-friendly way? What does this even mean?
guys why do you add nut zaps if LN supposedly works well?
Well it's generally a dangerous move since it now also involves reputation which is to game theory like regex to programmers (you had one problem, now with this you have two).
yes, but add fiat payment option
I've read "Being No One" by Metzinger first, then found out about Hoffman later, their ideas are very similar in many ways.
This is suddenly a very correct statement from my point of view. Care to share how you arrived at this conclusion? For me it was reading certain books.
I think it does soften the blow, maybe also as an admission that these things are possible in one way or another, so let's at least do them in most fair way. Definitely not something worthy of armed uprising imo unlike epstein list (if it turns out to be all true).