c6
c676db41
c676db41ab37244c3d24fee4f1563df72325fc0cee46149f986cfe9312ce0616

it is my town!! this the mayor!! guess who!

moms cooking for tomorrow.

love your tests. nagic happens

how difficult is to setup relays for you in your client? did you test this?

gracias a investigar con NOSTR me interesare en hacer funcionar mi propio nodo de bitcoin.

que paz ahora que he dejado de recibir spam.... ahora a preparar el automatismo para verificar a los plebs con NIP5...

#[0] deberias instalar de pago tu relay.

los servidores públicos siempre van a existir. servidores de pago que quieran hacer mas negocio necesitan servidores públicos para demostrar sus capacidades de gestion.

es interesante usar un relay propio de pago. evitas el spam y tampoco saturas los servidores publicos.

supongo que con el rele privado ahora funcionare mejor mas comodo.

I'm the author of gossip, a desktop client not a mobile app, but I have someting to say on this. Gossip downloads only about 4MB when I start it in the morning and run it for an hour. Since that is several orders of magnitude less than some other clients, I thought I'd make a list as to why:

1. Duplicate Events - many clients subscribe to the same filters on all of the "read" relays. So if a person has 10 read relays, they get each event 10 times. They could subscribe in a way that only gets N copies, where N is set in some setting somewhere (gossip defaults to 2 or 3).

2. Not Dynamically Connecting to Relays - when clients don't dynamically connect to the 'write' relays of whoever you follow, users are incentivized to add lots and lots of relays as a hack to try to get that content, aggrevating issue 1. If clients smartly went to the write relays (based on relay lists), all of the content a user has subscribed to would arrive (in best case scenario) and users would no longer feel the need to add massive numbers of read relays.

3. Counting how many followers you have is expensive. Kind-3 contact lists are long, and you need to pull one for each follower to make such a count. Especially if done across many relays (where the same ones are pulled multiple times, once per relay), this could be 10-20 MB on it's own. Then how often is the client triggered to recount?

4. Downloading of avatars: gossip caches these so it doesn't have to re-download them. Any client that uses an IMG tag and doesn't have a browser caching is probably downloading these over and over, at worst case every time a post scrolls into view.

5. Content images and content web page pre-rendering: This can be very expensive, but is probably unavoidable on rich UI clients. Gossip is a "poor" UI client, without any images or prerendered links (it just shows links that you can click on to open your browser). But with caching, repeated downloading of the same thing can be avoided.

6. Re-checking of NIP-05 could be done periodically, perhaps daily if it failed or every 2 weeks if it passed, probably the worst strategy is every time a post scrolls into view.

There are probably others.

#[0]

todavia en desarollo y esperando por #[0]

despues del carnaval viene la epoca de cultivos.

cambiamos el nombre de carnaval por fiesta del disfraz chino y no pasa nada.