I wish I could get eight hours a night. Actually, seven would be great too. Show me your ways!
Oof you witnessed the early years. What an era that was and one that will never repeated
I saw one of Oasis’s last gigs in Benicassim, Spain in summer 09. Glad I did as it was the only time I had drone. I’ve seen Liam live a couple of times since but it’s never be as good.
Zoltan Pozsar, the market analyst who the fiat bros tend to love and often quote, has admitted he doesn’t “understand #Bitcoin well”. Still so so early
Don’t give CoinDesk your attention (and ad clicks)
#ProofOfWalk 
Oh look, a young Trudeau :) 
Just wanna live close to a tropical beach in a bitcoin citadel with sat dollar parity. Is that too much to ask?
👀👀 nostr:note1u4rkqqsxsn3kevk2f4x6dtwuakwg9mpcapgx6mk0jme44cvctxns0xp3j8
Don’t think mine are either
GM! ☀️
I think we'll be doing some urban hiking (city walking) today. The weather is going to be **chef's kiss**
Enjoy your Saturday 😃
It’s amazing how much legacy social media depends on ad revenue. #Nostr is the only hope of an alternative
https://mashable.com/article/elon-musk-subscription-advertising-revenue-twitter-ceo-linda-yaccarino
Very cool 👌🏻 nostr:note1w2te6xp9343c6wp3mvep35erd07dzhnze7n9r8la2h04nqsn5k0secpcwz
I don't think F. Kennedy JR will become President but that he's discussing #Bitcoin as part of his campaign is a massive orange pill.
Thoughts on this by Balaji? Pasted from his tweet below:
STOPPING THE BACKDOOR ATTACK
In 2010, even after Twitter and Facebook helped catalyze the Arab Spring, people still would have thought it implausible if you'd said "in ten years, the most important political issue in the world for a few days will be whether the President of the United States could tweet."
But it was.
Similarly, in 2023, even after El Salvador has adopted Bitcoin, people still think it's implausible to say "by the end of this decade, the most important political issue in the world may be whether bankrupt governments have sufficient Bitcoin to fund their operations."
But it could be.
And in such a circumstance, what will desperate governments do? As of 2023, I don't think the conventional 51% attack by mining is something the US government could easily pull off. Maybe China could, but most mining is now outside China.
Instead, the federal government may try to compel Apple and Google (and other tech companies) to hunt for private keys on the servers, devices, and browsers they control. And to remit any stolen funds to a cash-hungry federal government.
This isn't cyberterrorism, it's cyberwar. It's not some random hacker who manages to sneak out a file. It's when the CEO of a company gives the lawful order to to hack their customers. This is similar to what happened to 140M Russians designated enemies of the state in early 2022 — every tech company turned on their former customers.
What's the possible target? We're talking billions of iPhones and Android phones, Mac laptops and Chrome browsers, Google Docs and Gmail. China could do the same with the Chinese smartphone manufacturers.
What's the possible defense? This is a tough situation. It's quite possible Tim Cook stands up to the pressure. He's been good on end-to-end encryption and stood up to the establishment on the CSAM on-device scanning initiative[1], which was an obvious way to get the snout under the tent.
If you can't trust the operating system itself, things get tricky. Linux is an answer but Linux devices may not scale in time. Exchanges built on Linux are another possible answer, but those are of course custodial and possibly also vulnerable to similar attacks.
I don't have all the answers, but I want to raise the question to get us to start thinking about it. It's possible that the answer here is in part social or political, not simply technological.