Hmmm… I might get plebstr running on it
https://nostrcheck.me/media/public/nostrcheck.me_4608566648105743581686929300.webp Found this little boy at my home 🧡
And yeah…building a new version of plebstr btw 🔥
nostr:npub1exv22uulqnmlluszc4yk92jhs2e5ajcs6mu3t00a6avzjcalj9csm7d828, nostr:npub1ezw0xm0w52rd4yfdg9zlw9qvwdy46alzelklkefptrd203m37tuq4djmeg, nostr:npub1getal6ykt05fsz5nqu4uld09nfj3y3qxmv8crys4aeut53unfvlqr80nfm, nostr:npub1cn670f663n3ks02jnnlsvd5y88zjnefy8343ykaxs7y3nzzketrsrjwt8a, nostr:npub1cj8znuztfqkvq89pl8hceph0svvvqk0qay6nydgk9uyq7fhpfsgsqwrz4u, nostr:npub1uq70uqgas9pyhds2zt57kr9se8rg3s68ztphjnq82ts8rzeknmeql7u0c2, nostr:npub1eqmj85el4pkg7qdj2jcae24qykev5evnyz2s6pzdytzpkhga4u5sdmhexk are just some of my faves
Thank you 🧡
Nostr: … thanks 😊
GM Zapstriches ⚡️🤙
Díky za super souhrn 😊
you never know what will happen, its good to cover as much as we can
What is the current state of eTags (also pTags)? I notice that everyone is implementing them differently. The preferred method involves using eTags with markers to indicate whether you are replying to the root post in a thread, replying to a comment, or mentioning. https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/blob/master/10.md
I've observed multiple versions of clients using eTags:
- Some clients use eTags without markers (this approach is currently deprecated, and it would be great to update it to a new method). The eTags that don't show much difference between a quote or reply ID.
- Some clients use some qTag for quoting
- Some clients post without any tags even though they contain a quote.
Could we agree on more standardized approach?
#[0] #[1] #[2]
I see and awesome release 🔥
I just asked cause was wondering if most of the clients moving to the same goal with tags. Seeems yes, but we will still try to cover as much as we can :)
What is the current state of eTags (also pTags)? I notice that everyone is implementing them differently. The preferred method involves using eTags with markers to indicate whether you are replying to the root post in a thread, replying to a comment, or mentioning. https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/blob/master/10.md
I've observed multiple versions of clients using eTags:
- Some clients use eTags without markers (this approach is currently deprecated, and it would be great to update it to a new method). The eTags that don't show much difference between a quote or reply ID.
- Some clients use some qTag for quoting
- Some clients post without any tags even though they contain a quote.
Could we agree on more standardized approach?
#[0] #[1] #[2]
During testing I see on snort that when I quote there is no tag added. Is it possible?
NIP-13 ne a zatím to není nějak v blízké budoucnosti plánováno. Zatím ani nejsem přesvědčený o užitku tohodle NIPU. Difficulty může zabránit spamu, ale bohužel ti co mají vyšší výkon a rychleji tímhle procházejí, tak jsou přesně ti co generují ten spam. Takže vlastně to ničemu moc nepomáhá.
NIP-20 podporujeme, každopádně dívám se, že máme chybu, kdy se to dostane do cache dříve a tváří se to jako hotové, dříve než by mělo. Opravíme díky za catch :)
What is the current state of eTags (also pTags)? I notice that everyone is implementing them differently. The preferred method involves using eTags with markers to indicate whether you are replying to the root post in a thread, replying to a comment, or mentioning. https://github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/blob/master/10.md
I've observed multiple versions of clients using eTags:
- Some clients use eTags without markers (this approach is currently deprecated, and it would be great to update it to a new method). The eTags that don't show much difference between a quote or reply ID.
- Some clients use some qTag for quoting
- Some clients post without any tags even though they contain a quote.
Could we agree on more standardized approach?
#[0] #[1] #[2]
Can I buy your note? How much zaps are needed from me?
I missclicked
lnbc4200n1pjgjcr7pp57yc2fvezumurzrmy2std7w877hd49gfphcqhcszr2uwpmv7csx9sdqqcqzpgxqrrsssp52qxtp4asr25d7vnre6ahz7xn3z9lc2k2avdpy02xyp865gq443sq9qyyssqpf7ehcsul5lm227aueeg4gs49zxf5sh7s5veyrqysez879s0zdly0grwyxauz2skd3qfw4qwep5sy5n2qgn59m5c58zcl9ns0yhdsygpzv079q
nostr:note10y32ju57q38s95hu986jvwkhjxey8jkxfmwd87rzwkkg225hx97qjfm9ad