Cognitive “dissonance” not “dissidents”

Some argue that since miners can already include transactions with large OP-return data fields we should remove the filter from nodes.

Instead I suggest we consider a consensus rule change (fork) to block miners from including large OP-return transactions.

Some argue that since miners can already include transactions with large OP-return data fields we should remove the filter from nodes.

Instead I suggest we consider a consensus rule change (fork) to block miners from including large op-return transactions.

Good morning Jeff! But “cognitive dissonance” not “dissidents” 😉

https://www-cnbc-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2023/02/23/block-sq-earnings-q4-2022.html?amp_js_v=0.1#webview=1&cap=swipe