Avatar
xplbzx
cbd2779fb1a3c661dc21e5444f8bf25c7a3485831840d4692bf1cc4d72a5b029
⠎⠞⠁⠽ ⠓⠥⠍⠃⠇⠑ ⠁⠝⠙ ⠎⠞⠁⠉⠅ ⠎⠁⠞⠎

.. and 1000 millisatoshi in a sat. If we gonna be perfunctory on LN.

Policies that are carried out from the head of the Jewish state have little to do with the average Jewish person. Fact.

Also, the value of fish and most other things 'go up' with increased adoption, as they can be used as a medium of exchange. Another fact.

How is speculation on anything different to speculation on anything else? Still, it has been happening and encouraged long before Bitcoin. Yet another fact.

Your words and opinions are no longer tolerated here.

—— The mods

Some great UX on nostr now and maybe it's the developers we owe the most, I still feel protocol users deserve some love. We're all just trying to navigating our routes, occassionally things still going weird

Imagine, one day, using technology to store, secure and retrieve your own data, and at no extra cost.

Free-market economics, locally. An outsourced global manufacturing hub is resulting in political pressure being extorted in order to further extend dominance, allowing dependance to take root. It may be a simplification but I imagine that like with UX, we now see trends where the path of least resistance is not what we want or need anymore. Do people actually know what they want and need? Consumer/ developed nations would be actually doing okay by dealing with the challenges of not being able to buy so many finished goods, running trade deficits fueling political tension. If a nation can achieve food security and maintain defence, the enxt logical question should be what can it produce and develop for its own neeeds. Protectionism might be spun as an ugly word, but it's a reaction to a mirror-image of itself.

I agree but I guess the upshot isn't just focus long-term safety in the foodchain, it might be asked why research into creating a credit system for carbon is being introduced by policymakers and multinationals, even though the same necessity to research and fund environmental policy are not shared, nor adhered to by more populous regions with carbon-intensive industrial actions.

There are many other environmental approaches we could take rather than adultering the diet of livestock. Begs the question, is this policy actually sane, and serve the public interest. I suspect not.

Exactly. Their policy commitments pre-election and post-election were duplicitous.

The Chancellor of the Exchequer came out with 'I don't care if everyone hates me'.

This is the best they have to offer. IMO, any party would have been better than this.

I think he's just trying to shift any kind of liability from his own cabinet and at the same time seeking some popular opinion because they have none. There was no intended admission of selling out the nation.

Could you imagine overhearing this dialogue IRL?

double down | verb

a) To double ones wager: War criminals like, Hillary Clinton, John Edwards and Barack Obama all wanted to get out of Iraq. They all wanted to double down in Afghanistan, look at how that worked out.

b) To double or significantly increase a risk, investment, or other commitment: Retarded day traders used leverage, doubled down and got wiped out.

c) To justify an erroneous assumption to weak-minded fools that they need to support an unpopular idea: We need to double down on Ukraine.