None of the fees on lightning go to miners. In the future, if users are all going to be using lightning (not possible anyway), who is going to be paying miners to secure the chain? Seems like a problem

Bitcoin is no longer a retail game. It’s a treasury game.

🚨 In addition to MicroStrategy, Semler Scientific also announced the acquisition of 215 BTC.

The company also began using the term "BTC Yield" as a performance indicator, to reflect the growth of Bitcoin reserves in relation to each share issued.

Saylor’s playbook has already spread and several companies have become passive buyers of BTC via excess cash flow.

Are you paying attention to this movement?

who mines lighting?

Benjamin Franklin

Zeus

already starting to feel like holiday season

especially with this 35 degree weather

That's something English speakers have a hard time relating with because they associate sex and gender. But in most languages, gender and sex a different things. For example, in my native Portuguese, we can say sentences as:

- A baleia é macho (the whale is male)

In this sentence, "A" is female, but "macho" means "male", thus i am using a female noun (baleia, meaning whale) and specifying it is actually a male animal. The gramatical gender of the word bears no relation to the sex of the animal.

For us, the use of 4th gender for vegetables is a plausible thing. Because gender is a language construct, not related to sex.

Is it over?

I’m such a romantic 🥰 🤣🤣🤣

nostr:note1ls99zknrsvtaw97yrmcfr7mv253ydjh2rhgqwarm0tfjal4a8x2ssvwne0

that really depends on the language you're speaking. In german, greek or russian, you've got 3 genders, masculine, feminine and neutral. In some languages you can have even more, like in Dyirbal (Australian Aboriginal language) where you have four genders: masculine, feminine, neuter, and vegetable.

English has no gramatical gender, but instead has "gender pronouns" (he, she and it). In my opinion, that's why there is such a confusion between gender and "sex" in that language.