Avatar
Hollis Hedrich
cfab2c11abb8ce962600fcfc4f2fa6d7675f519c88f6eaa24f638837b9587beb
Live free or die...it's that simple.
Replying to Avatar Muju 6.0🌋⚡

In my quest for humanist ideals and consistent atheistic critique, I've encountered accusations of partiality in my recent discussions on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. To clarify: my scrutiny does not play favorites. Whether it's Islam, Judaism, Christianity, Hinduism, or Buddhism—no theology that dehumanizes and rationalizes atrocity escapes my examination.

The narrative of the "chosen people" in Judaism lies at the core of Jewish supremacy. Jewish individuals strategically employ anti-Semitism, akin to how Islamic supremacists employ Islamophobia, in order to deflect criticism of their dogmatic beliefs.

As a staunch advocate for secular humanism, I stand firm in my conviction that no religion should justify acts of aggression. Observing the harrowing conflict between Israel and Palestine, I see the echoes of religious narratives fueling division and violence. My criticism remains unwavering, aimed at the ideologies that underpin such conflicts, not the people ensnared by them.

If you are curious or unsure about my position, I encourage you to read my essay. It delves into the complexities of this issue and invites you to consider the principles that shape my analysis and criticism, as well as my stance on Islam. I believe that open dialogue and a strong commitment to humanist values are crucial for fostering understanding, even in the midst of controversy and disagreement.

For me, the pursuit of a post-religious world—where atheism and humanism guide our ethics and actions—is paramount. I place the integrity of my beliefs and the quest for intellectual consistency above the comfort of conformity or the preservation of feelings. In advocating for a society free from religious dogma, my stance is unwavering and uncompromising. While I am open to dialogue and critique, my dedication to a rational, secular, and humane future remains steadfast, regardless of popular opinion or emotional resistance. The path I choose is one of principled resolve, for the advancement of humanism and the realization of an enlightened, post-religious society.

https://muju.substack.com/p/blasphemy-is-a-form-of-dissent

Not all who believe in a God are "religious".

Replying to Avatar Lyn Alden

I used to believe in political incrementalism- the idea that you can change things gradually through better election outcomes.

But maybe it was also just youth, I don’t know.

After spending many years studying how the current monetary system works, studying how past debt and currency cycles ended, and based on practical realities from the past two election cycles, I dropped any notion of incrementalism, at least for the big economic things.

Incrementalism works for minority groups to gain social and political rights. Religious people to practice without interference, women to vote, gay people to marry, etc. Immigration policies. Things like that. But it doesn’t work for the financial system.

Instead, history and current affairs suggest that things generally point in the same structural financial direction, uncontested, until there is a massive fiscal crisis, geopolitical crisis, and trend change. And that is when politics becomes critical in all aspects- as chaos develops, the group that has enough power to set the next order *really* fucking matters. They either build a platform of virtue toward the next cycle, or they fall into the unfortunately common paths of communism or fascism.

And it is not just ideas that triumph, but technology too. Technology plays a big role in which ideas are even workable. Both ideas and technology are important.

So when I realized incrementalism wasn’t working, I sought out other methods.

The weaker method is just social- I try to put things out there with my platform to encourage reason, empathy, human rights, etc. Not partisan but also not necessarily moderate, but rather grounded in firm principles of virtue ethics.

The stronger method is to play some small part in building something better. Alternative money. Alternative communication methods. Either explaining and recommending them to people, or directly venture investing in companies that build on them and help improve the UX and solve new problems.

That’s my goal. I want to do whatever tiny part I can to bring about more peace, more fairness, more opportunity, more growth, and less destruction.

We have a nirvana fast here today. I didn't see him but I could have... I was just pissed that I had to see them with ten thousand other people instead of two hundred.

Please get the fuck out. But these stupid celebrities always say that shit. Then all they ever do is just jack off and complain.

I remember the first time that I heard Nevermind. I thought this is gonna be so great because this is the greatest shit I've ever heard and hardly anyone else is gonna like them. I'm gonna get to see them in a club with maybe 200 other people. Ha ha, my bad.

I stand with people, not governments.