Avatar
jericho
cfd5ef02b6cc02765e1e18340b3a77099218d69cf2e7c312ce1ebcd2b90f7309
son of god | husband | father | student | teacher
Replying to Avatar Gigi

šŸ–•

Yeah, because I have a counterfeiting main my garage… šŸ™„

It’s an interesting thing; some people out there try to push the stupidest damn notes you’ve never thought of.

Peoples Voice

WEF: ā€˜All Travel Will Soon Be Restricted by Personal Carbon Allowances’

November 28, 2023

By Sean Adl-Tabatabai

.webp

The World Economic Forum has declared that all travel in the near future will be severely restricted by the amount of personal carbon allowances a person has.

According to a report by Intrepid Travel and The Future Labs Institute, the majority of the human population will be prohibited from travel in order to save the planet from ā€˜global boiling.’

Bombthrower.com reports: From the report (pardon the length, emphasis added):

ā€œCarbon Passports

A personal carbon emissions limit will become the new normal as policy and people’s values drive an era of great change.

As demonstrated by a worldwide tourism boom, the frequency at which we can fly is once again seemingly unlimited.

Conscience and budgets permitting, we feel free to hop on planes from one place to the next. But this will change. ā€˜On our current trajectory, we can expect a pushback against the frequency with which individuals can travel, with carbon passports set to change the tourism landscape,’ says Raymond [Martin Raymond, Future Laboratories co-founder]

Personal carbon allowances could help curb carbon emissions and lower travel’s overall footprint.

These allowances will manifest as passports that force people to ration their carbon in line with the global carbon budget, which is 750bn tonnes until 2050.

By 2040, we can expect to see limitations imposed on the amount of travel that is permitted each year.

Experts suggest that individuals should currently limit their carbon emissions to 2.3 tonnes each year – the equivalent of taking a round-trip from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, to Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. However, the average carbon footprint in the US is 16 tonnes per person per year, 15 tonnes in Australia and 11.7 tonnes in the UK. This is in stark contrast to where we may find ourselves in the future, with 2040’s travellers forced to forgo the horizon-expanding experiences so readily embraced by today’s touristsā€

For all practical purposes, your carbon emissions will line up with your energy usage, give or take a relatively narrow band of efficiencies (unless we have some kind of clean energy breakthrough, and the only viable one we have, nuclear, is not considered clean energy by the climate cult).

Said differently: Your standard of living is your energy usage. Reducing a society’s energy usage is the same as reducing its living standards.

With this in mind, let’s look at the numbers cited by the Sustainable Future for Travel report:

ā€œExperts suggest that individuals should currently limit their carbon emissions to 2.3 tonnes each year.ā€

The table below lays out exactly how much the standard of living for the residents of each country will have to be reduced in order to meet the recommended carbon quota set by unelected experts. This is the level of ā€œdegrowthā€ it will take to satisfy the objectives of climate alarmists relying on unfalsifiable premises, arbitrary computer models, and who are deliberately ignoring and suppressing countervailing data.

.webp

How serious are our leaders and policymakers about reducing the citizenry’s living standards by upwards of 85%?

Here is Canada’s Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault, rather blithely confirming that the government will limit natural gas usage in order to fight climate change:

Reporter: There will be limitations on how much natural gas you can use in the winter?

Guilbeault: Yes, absolutely, that’s what fighting climate change looks like.

Full clip:

Canadian Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault rather blithely answering a reporter who asked "will the government limit natural gas usage in the winter?"

(Short answer: "Of Course! That's What fighting climate change looks like!")

Watch: pic.twitter.com/sau9p2CMnW

— Mark Jeftovic, The ₿itcoin Capitalist (@StuntPope) November 25, 2023

https://w3.do/_vvyKsEN

#WEF #PersonalCarbon #CarbonPassports #CarbonEmissions #Footprint #EnergyUsage #ClimateChange

These people won’t have to worry about carbon emissions. They’re going to have to worry about high speed lead poisoning.

Even the POTUS twitter editor can’t form coherent sentences…

šŸ¤¦ā€ā™‚ļø

https://x.com/potus/status/1729320458036679069?s=46

Regulate into freedom…

šŸ¤¦ā€ā™‚ļø

"We want to make sure the increasing use of digital payments occurs in a way that helps promote greater competition, innovation and productivity across our entire economy."

https://www.reuters.com/technology/australia-amend-law-regulate-digital-payments-like-apple-google-pay-2023-11-27/

Got lazy on the fitness discipline lately. Yesterday was day one of Tactical Barbell - Base Building - just finished up day two.

No excuses.

Property taxes for vehicles make me sick to my stomach. Nearly $1000 total for two vehicles, both of which have over 100k miles on them.

🤬

I’m not an insurance agent or an auto engineer- but it doesn’t make sense to me…

Cars hit each other all the time and don’t explode, but now one is going fast and becomes airborne and suddenly it just explodes? Please someone explain this to me.

Inflationary policies and State actors are going full bore on screwing over as many people as they can; the problem seems to be that a lot of people aren’t thinking, and accept the šŸ‚ šŸ’© propaganda that the state driven medias are producing.

It’s probably been this way longer than we realize, but now with cracks showing in the Matrix, we can see what is wrong with the world. Just not enough people are waking up fast enough to change it yet.

Truth will prevail, but it’s going to be harder before it gets easier.

I’m afraid it’s going to get a lot harder…