agree that calling it a Google Search is not contextually congruent. is there a different way to accuratey refer to an efficient search that can be filtered?
could it filter results by criteria such as number of replies, reposts, hearts, or sata zapped?
a basic diagram of how the protocol functions could be helpful without invoking bias
what post were you referring to here? I don't see a reference in Primal..
but I see now that str is the accepted suffix for nostrified
or perhaps GitTr is more etymologicaly accurate
This is why we need GitStr.
nostr:note1e0xlv5qhdqtavhpx2mg9tuqgcu5vwe8mr7d7e3s4dzp256y9kyjq4r7470
😢🤞❤️🩹
Interesting. Hope further research can clarify exactly how mitochondria are effected and suggest a treatment.
Is it worse to have your child's data incorporated into an AI, sold by corporate actors, or simply made freely available on social media? I think all would increase the risk of deepfakes and other harmful exploitation. https://www.politico.com/news/2023/12/29/artificial-intelligence-privacy-schools-00132790 #ai #privacy
a very useful correction here: https://nitter.net/mononautical/status/1725813952377127375
bitcoind does rely on the mempool for fee estimation.
the estimatesmartfee algorithm works by tracking how long transactions in different "fee buckets" wait in the mempool before getting confirmed.
which means it needs to see a representative sample in the mempool.
though would missing ordinals really affect fee estimation as long as there's an adequate sample domain of transaction fee sizes? (fyi this is Signoi from RaspiBolt)
Preston, I got carried away and zapped this post thinking I was tipping you directly. How can I publicly tip you for your episodes? vmvd please enjoy the sats :)