Reproduction in an already overpopulated world.

Oh, I see. you're not serious at all. Bye bye

Simple Google search turns up pages of mainstream media coverage. CBS, NBC, and so forth. WTF are you talking about?

Simple Google search turns up pages of mainstream media coverage. CBS, NBC, and so forth. WTF are you talking about?

I'm disappointed to hear you say that...

"All scripture is breathed out by God..."

It is inspired, inerrant, and infallible. It carries the weight, meaning, and authority of its Author.

There is a time to turn the other cheek, and there is a time to strike back. It takes discernment to when to do which.

This was covered by newsweek, cbs, msn

This was covered by newsweek, cbs, msn

"Thou shalt not murder."

"Thou shalt not commit adultery."

"Thou shalt not steal."

"Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor."

"Thou shalt not covet."

These are not specifically Christian principles. They are *human* principles. They are the moral law of God our Creator, written on every heart, testified by conscience, and recognized throughout most of history as the Natural Law. You will note that each one is 1) directed toward individuals [the 'thou' is singular]; and 2) each one presupposes private property.

Each one has a corollary, e.g., the command not to steal includes the right to not be stolen from, etc. These laws, therefore, are the basis of Natural Rights as well. Even in the "First Table," the command to worship God means that no one can prevent or even force you to worship in some given way--God alone is the Lord of conscience--this is freedom of worship and freedom of conscience.

This is the law which binds all men, in all times, in all places, and to recognize and uphold these wholesome laws one does not need to be specifically Christian to do so. Our conscience will confirm it--especially if someone violates them toward us.

#LexRex

It's against Scripture because the kingdom of God is not built by the sword, but by the Word and the Spirit. We are pilgrims; "here we have no continuing city," etc. We are, for now, like Rahabs in a cosmic Jericho and the King is coming (that's how we pray, isn't it? 'Thy kingdom come'?) There's more to it, but that's a short answer.

I agree (with Spooner) that the Constitution (specifically, the Bill of Rights) is a dead letter--but that's not how the Left (and their media) would spin it: they always trot out the Constitution and civil liberties when it suits their ends (and ignore it altogether when it doesn't). I'm not saying it's a legitimate argument, I'm saying that's how it will be used. "The real action is your target's reaction." "The issue is never the issue: the issue is the [Marxist] revolution." They are trying very hard to paint *all* Christians as domestic terrorists and it won't take much to do it if people keep taking their obvious bait. Think how easy it was for the masses to buy the "George Floyd" and BLM nonsense? Think how easy it was to fool the masses into fear over a glorified flu?

As to how to battle enemies of liberty -- we have to recognize their linguistic tactics and counter them. We have to not fall into their traps (and they are sneaky). And we have to speak the truth. I don't hold out much hope for political "saviors" to end the cultural dilution we're experiencing, but (IMO) we can still pursue peaceful and legal means to stop it. Either way, militant Christian nationalism will backfire drastically as it always has. Who would be in charge, the Roman catholics? The Presbys? The Babtists? The Quakers? It's quixotic. We need to return to the principles of the founding (i.e., classical liberalism) culturally, regardless of our elected leaders or whatever "paper tigers" exist. That means education, evangelism, persuasion--a return to Natural Law and Natural Rights. Yes: that's an enormous amount of work to undo the last 60 years of Marxist indoctrination in the schools. It may or may not work--but the church *as church* grasping after the sword of the State is NOT the way. Citizens *as citizens* who understand our true classical liberal heritage, rooted in a transcendent Creator and Divine lawgiver, who will write and enforce wholesome laws (and repeal the unwholesome) are needed in local office--regardless of their personally held religion. One does not need to be a Christian per se to recognize these Natural Law and Natural Rights principles to govern well.

...I'll stop there, it's already probably too long. Thank you for the engagement.

This was covered by newsweek, cbs, msn

its not that deep, its either nationalism or the great replacement. the trap is that they have made you ideologically opposed to fighting back

It goes against Scripture for one thing, but it's also (usually) contrary to the 1st Amendment. The term means too many things to accurately critique it--it depends on who's saying it--but that's exactly how it is being exploited: taking the theonomists' extreme version of it, making that the given meaning, then saying they're "unconstitional" for wanting to remove the 1st Amendment and establish Christianity.

I think the whole thing -- the revived Christian Nationalism -- is a trap.

I'm actually shocked

No, he's not anti-Christian. He works very closely with Michael O'Fallon of Sovereign Nations (see yt channel), for example. He is anti-"Christian Nationalism" (as we all should be, IMO). Lindsay is personally agnostic the last I heard. He is an old school liberal; his beef was partly that no persons should destroy the property of others (regardless of either's religion), but more particulalry that the left is baiting Christians into violence in order to justify "the rising danger of Christian Nationalism" and thus get gov support to crack down on it -- and all Christians would fall into that dragnet. An attack like that is giving the left exactly the ammunition they want. "The real action is your target's reaction."

Lindsay is not a Christian, so is not exactly an "ally" but is certainly what Francis Schaeffer called a "co-belligerent" against the forces of collectivism / the modern "woke" who are explicitly anti-liberal (as in classical liberalism).