still not selling

Hey did everyone hear about the Bitcoin ETF? 🫠🫠🫠🫠

Forgive me if I could care less.

Bitcoin has never been for the institution’s. Nothing about an institution represents freedom to me.

High time preference hyena froth.

#bitcoin 🔥🚀🫂🦩

“The institutions are coming” was a meme in the last cycle.

And it was partially true. Small businesses came. High net worth people came. Forward thinking public companies with bitcoiner leaders like MicroStrategy and Square/Block came. Even a few big insurance companies and asset managers dabbled.

But that was premature. The institutions just tasted. Their leaders bought with their personal accounts or otherwise understood, but couldn’t put big regulated money in. And it was a crazy time- with fiscal stimulus many things were a bubble.

I talk to some institutions, and like, they get it now. That’s not exactly news when Larry Fink is on tv calling it a flight to quality. But I will reinforce it anecdotally- institutions increasingly get it, or at least some of it.

Most people only see the prior cycle or two. They don’t see all prior cycles since inception because that requires looking at a log chart and putting in a few hundred hours of research.

Bitcoin has to get big enough to hit your radar, lead you to form an opinion on it, collapse, and then hit your radar even bigger again, for most people to get it. It’s not about “all cycles”; it’s about their *specific* cycle of understanding it, forming an opinion, and then seeing another cycle that either validates or challenges their opinion.

Also, many people will get emotional this cycle. Fade emotions and focus on fundamentals.

Anyway, enjoy your evening.

Good morning. Here's to a nice day ☕🫂🦩

PPP - purchasing power parity can be maintained well by hodl #bitcoin over years- only volatile is dollar n stablecoin #plebchain

In the end there will be only bitcoin

we will not waver

As developed nations continue to enter sovereign debt crises akin to the 1940s, there are a few main outcomes.

Option 1) In a world without bitcoin, or if bitcoin fails, central banks and their governments recapitalize themselves with gold, devalue the people, and do another cycle of this inflationary policy for the next few generations. The Treasury/Fed handbook literally has a written option for this, although it is stated more opaquely. It can be done in the US (and probably many other countries) based on current laws if shit hits the fan. Denmark's central bank and China's economic ministers have also written similar things regarding extreme outcomes. It's pretty straightforward based on the past.

Option 2) We go into a centralized technocratic future. Centralized AI and CBDCs win. People have cuck money that the AI+government control. It's like Brave New World, 1984, take your pick. Hard to say, but not free.

Option 3) Open source money wins. Bitcoin and its ecosystem win. Governments get defunded from their fiat printers, and have to be more honest with their ledgers or default and get reconstructed since they can't print what their people hold as savings, or in the hegemon's case, can't print what the world holds. Probably a world of chaos for a time during the transition, but also an opportunity for peace and building the next era. Keeping track of the nukes would probably be a big deal, like when the Soviet Union fell. It's actually kind of remarkable that they collapsed economically and politically but in an orderly enough way to keep track of and secure most of the nukes.

I don't know which one will win, but I consider Option 3 to be the honorable method; the path of transparency. That's the one I am rooting for and building for.

If I fail, I would like it written that it's the method I tried for, but realistically the AI+government will probably delete most of the records of all of the failures anyway, since that is how history works, without any sort of objective truth keeper. Our best hope is to hide records in a distributed way and hope they can remain undisturbed for a while. At least bitcoiners have a tendency to write stuff in steel and make low time preference things. Some psychopath will hopefully carve a life work in steel in a cave or something, but who knows, lol.

And ironically, if Option 3 wins, any of the losing factions could still insert their ideas and paths into the Bitcoin blockchain, now or in the future. It's the most immutable database that we know how to build, and would preserve their ideas as it does our ideas. Like, you know what? I *want* the Communist Manifesto to be in the immutable Bitcoin blockchain, because I want people in the future to know how *bad* it is. It might already be in there; I don't know. I wouldn't want people centuries from now to think about those ideas and believe they came up with something new; I want to preserve my enemies' texts because I believe I can win through markets, force, virtue, and truth.

I think that's almost always what determines the winning side. Losers want to burn their enemies' texts to ensure that their good ideas don't spread too much. Winners want to preserve their enemies' texts to ensure that their bad ideas are never repeated.

Orange pilling a guy at the wedding in Ireland 🇮🇪

Show him how #nostr works

elusivepoison77@walletofsatoshi.com

Good morning ☕

I am not a smart man, but I remain humble.

Gm🧡

Gm!

Good morning! 🦩🌞☕ I wish you a fantastic Saturday! I hope you can enjoy the weekend to the fullest. 😊