I made the argument that bitcoin is inherently deflationary, which makes it more and more scarce and is disastrous as a long-term solution (except for the early adopters, similar to investment bankers of today, who we all hate).
You deflected and refuse to argue.
You call me a midwit.
But the point still stands.
I know you're clocking "show" on all of these anyway, because you can't help yourself. You need the dopamine.
I notice that you didn't address my point that bitcoin is inherently deflationary due to attrition over time and instead tried to turn that into a feature instead.
Try again.
blocking someone = admission that they won
The same thing will happen on bluesky or whatever it's called. Just wait.
If they're smart, they'll make it a little more subtle this time, which is definitely doable given the rapid increase in chatbot capabilities (likely for the very purpose of deceiving the masses).
Almost like the people here are happy to trade one slave system for another under the guise of "freedom," when in reality, it's far more invasive than it ever was before.
And of course nobody like to talk about how bitcoin is inherently deflationary, as people's wallets (secret keys) get lost/destroyed, transfers get made to defunct accounts, etc., the currency becomes more and more scarce.
But I suppose the would-be freedom fighters who adopted early (who are totally not like bankers at all) are okay with their own currency gaining value indefinitely, should their scheme be adopted en masse.
Nice projection. Your entire existence revolves around mammon.
You are the one who is sad inside, if only you had the courage to admit it.
What a mighty fine circlejerk we have here.
So the mindset here is:
> bitcoin is the future
> but only if you invested in it 15 years ago
> also we really hate how banks have all the money and we want that to change so that we early adopters have all the money, and we are totally better than the bankers we hate, shutup shitcoiner pleb you wouldn't understand
> has two buzzwords and lightning bolt in name
nah bro, we don't worship money, zaps are just a nice little gesture, we're not addicted to the cocaine-like dopamine rush they give us, you got it all wrong bro
You were meant to inherit your parents' bitcoin wallets, that's REAL generation wealth, guys!
NOSTR IS JUST LIKE MARVEL SUPERHEROES OMG OMG OMG
Satellites now play a crucial role in our understanding of what is causing CO2 & CH4 to rise.
Analysing satellite data for last year the team at Kayrros (https://www.kayrros.com) identified 1,005 CH4 super-emitter events in 2022, of which 559 were from oil and gas fields, 105 from coalmines, and 340 from waste sites, such as landfills.
These are pictured here:
#ClimateLiteracy #Methane
lol
keep shilling
Maybe we should all just go back to hanging out on one another's porches and talking, like everyone did before TV and radio.
Basically it's retarded to have everyone spam all their messages to all of the relays and expect this to go well as more users and more relays join the network.
Computer nerd lingo for talking about complexity.
O(n) means "on the order of n operations" or "on the order of n amount of space" in the worst case.
O(n^2) mean "on the order of n^2 operations" etc. etc.
Where n is the number of input elements.
For instance, the "bubble sort" algorithm, when given n elements, takes "on the order of" n^2 operations to complete, or O(n^2).
In the case of Nostr, the number of connections in a social graph is "on the order of" n relays * m users. In reality it's not actually that bad, but that is an upper bound for how bad it "could" be.
It's known as "big-O" notation. There's also "little-o" notation. And omega, and others, for those inclined.
Okay, okay, fine. O(m*n).