if nostr is primarily used for consuming posts from big producers, then any level of decentralization in the network won't matter because we haven't decentralized the flow of information

I support banning anyone over the age of 18 being allowed to vote

Anarchy Light

#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=1080x934&blurhash=%3BeJRmoWB%253Rj-%3Bof%25MkB%25M%5E%2Bs%3Ba_NFayj%5BWBj%5BRk%7EXRjWBofWBj%3FayoeWBtPRjt7t7V%40afoffiay-%3Bofj%3FofaeWBWBWBayoMj%3FWBofj%5BWBRjayj%5BxvoeWAWBj%5BfkWBj%5BayInoMWBazofayj%5BfPof&x=dbe1d342b67fef7d806bd52d92f19b98cf9c1afea372d56e5ca18378d9b60f77

Hey gringo, you already head about António Conselheiro from Brazil?

When brazilians was just to becaming a republic, a lawyer called António Vicente Mendes Maciel, well knowed as Conselheiro (that means counselor) seceded from Brazil with a group of people on an abandoned farm called Canudos, with the aim of building their lives with tooth and nail no paying to taxes, they called that place Belo Monte (Beautiful Hill).

The government journal published lies and jokes about they, and when city reach to 20 thousand in population they send the brazilian army to destroy then, Belo Monte fight against brazilian army using hunting guns and destroied then twice. Then, the arm bring cannons and extermined until the last children.

But ideas can't be killed, right? A journalist called Euclides da Cunha followed the battle and later found the Conselheiro's manuscripts and the truth about the battle was exposed to the nation, they was just people trying to be left alone and keep they community, and the cruelty of how these people that thinks they own the brazilians souls was forever included in the praxeology manual of every agorist, the history.

These brazilians tyrants was the slaves ownerships, when the slaves were freed, the Brazilian king was dethroned and these guys took power and exterminated those who did not bow down.

Since this time Brazil government change and changes, but keep active the practice of democide and all the big companies are controlled monopolies guaranteed by their slavery system preventing the poor from growing without getting dirty with them.

#brasil #brazil #canudos #conselheiro

r u bofa employee? everyone interpret way they like - but DATA = FACT

DB centralization AI ongoing slowly - CBDC arrival prep - physical branch closures 2024

Some of you still drink milk and that's disgusting

I honestly don’t care about the short term effects of bitcoin…

I’m interested in what will happen in 50-100 years from now…

In general, trends can be somewhat unfortunate, as many follow trends to fit in but may not have much thought or consideration for what they are doing beyond that. My horses go barefoot when it is appropriate. Until they are three years old, they are unshod, and often when they are on summer pasture. We live in Norway with snow and ice, and to avoid injuries in the winter, we rely on training horses having shoes with studs and hoof-grip. In the summer months, the hooves wear down a lot due to stones and gravel on the roads and paths here, which is why we use flat shoes in the summer. Our horses are trained six days a week; if they were only trained sporadically or once or twice a week, then boots might be relevant. But in our situation with many horses, a lot of activity, and rough terrain outdoors, we avoid problems like soreness and poor well-being by using shoes. Lastly, we shoe our horses every seven weeks by a very skilled farrier. If we did not have access to a good farrier, the assessment would probably be somewhat different. Poor shoeing is much worse than going barefoot. So under certain circumstances, such as young horses, soft ground, little training, or a less skilled farrier, I am absolutely positive about barefoot horsekeeping.

As long as you see the whole situation and make an assessment based on that, keeping the horse's best interests in mind, it doesn't matter much whether they are shod or barefoot—just as long as it works :)