Avatar
Currency of Distrust
da26e54b86c9a395a4233cbb540fe2aa93cdad4a9b657ed5a724efed5859d23d
Christian | Husband | Father Professional hacker Lover of freedom tech
Replying to Avatar Lyn Alden

People often assume that whoever their god is, that it is standing with them specifically. In the US, they often separate this view along party lines.

Conservatives to some extent imagine Jesus standing with them on the border with a rifle protecting Christendom against anarchy. Even if many of those immigrants are ::checks notes:: also Christians. If a "woke" bishop calls for compassion on immigrants and is not a fan of the twice-divorced President who can't name his favorite bible chapter and forgot to put his hand on the bible when being sworn in, she's somehow the baddie rather than him, even among Christians.

Progressives to some extent imagine Jesus walking around in Gaza or Haiti or Sudan attending to the least advantaged among us. He shuns the empire and tends to them. And yet, while Jesus called for pacifism and was a rhetorical saint among chill speakers, many of them find a way to mentally turn extremists into heroes. Anything the underdog society does against the dominant society is justified. Even if it's violent toward civilians. In our media rebels are cool, but in reality they often like to kill the gays or the civilians, so it gets awkward pretty fast rather than being like the cool Star Wars rebels vs the Empire.

I find myself in a weird camp that almost nobody is onboard with.

I'm like, "Yes, we actually need to secure our borders. We need to be more scrutinizing for our society's sake. We need slower, higher-end immigration. And we actually need to enforce the rule of law for theft on the streets."

But also,

"No, I don't think Jesus of Nazareth as depicted in text would be onboard with this border view. He'd view us like Rome. Let's not re-imagine him as onboard with this. We're rooting for ourselves; he'd root for the underdogs."

I'm too woke for the conservatives and too based for the progressives.

The US was involved with multiple coups in Latin America. We ran the reserve currency and tried to bend them to our will with their dollar-denominated debt 40 years ago by spiking the value of that debt. Some of them went into retarded socialism and rekt themselves throughout that time period too; it's not all our fault. But it's some of our fault.

And then we militarily entered the Middle East. We made deals with them, funded them against the Soviets, and then turned against them. We've invaded them at like a 100:1 ratio vs them invading us with one major incidence (9/11). And as much as I am a fan of Jews as a people (as someone who grew up in Northeastern USA where Jews are relatively dense, I'd happily have them settle all around here), Israel is a state is colonial; our western powers displaced Gazans to make it and have been fighting that reality ever since.

We're Rome. And like Rome, we think we are justified. And along those lines, we're probably partially right, and probably partially wrong.

When you take a view, imagine every possible view opposing it.

And as the US dominates as neo-Rome, I think we will realize how distant we are from Jesus the hippie.

Lyn, I love your takes so much, I totally agree with this. I also highly sympathize with too woke for conservatives and too based for the progressives. I’ve felt similar a lot lately

I’m with you 100% and I’m doing all these but my new job has a 401k with match. So planning on putting enough to get the full match, but not really interested in “traditional” investments

What is the most based way to invest 401k funds?

I gave my son some bitcoin stickers and he immediately stuck them to his buzz lightyear toy. So now, his name in our house is officially “Bitcoin Buzz” 🤣

What I don’t understand is how anyone thinks LLMs will result in some new breakthrough like this. LLMs are statistical machines that find most likely matches based on its training data. The “solution” needs to be in the data in the first place. It’s literally just finding the statistically most likely response, which is the opposite of creating innovation.

Call me a Luddite, but I don’t see how this pursuit of “AGI” doesn’t end in an absolute dystopian nightmare.

The idea that giant corporations will somehow become benevolent once they achieve their goals is ridiculous.

Maybe open source AI is part of the counter balance, but the plebs won’t have anywhere near the energy that the corpos will have.

Replying to Avatar H

Yes

lol well, enjoy your AI utopia then, I guess.

So you think that all that compute being controlled by only a few companies is a good thing? I don’t see anything in that note saying that AI or tech is bad, but that those in power will use that tech to spy on us all at an unprecedented level.

Every fiat corporation will give you some speech about how they "take security seriously".

And it's not like they don't care at all. They would prefer to avoid the headaches that come with a data breach.

But the reality is this - when costs need to be cut, #cybersecurity staffing and spend are one of the first things on the table. It's a pure cost center. Some folks in the industry are smart and have done everything they can to make security a competitive advantage, but it will never be a true revenue driver for 99% of businesses.

Companies also have obligations to obtain your sensitive data, because of #KYC and #AML laws. And while you're scraping very sensitive data, the incentive is to just get everything you can! Maybe it will pay off some day...

This is yet another reason I am so fascinated by Bitcoin and Nostr. The idea of being able to transact on the internet in a private way is massive. Shipping these features will do more to "solve" cybersecurity than anything else.

The easiest way to secure sensitive data is to never obtain in the first place!

Ohhhh fascinating take about WW2

Elon is so cringe, I cannot handle it 🤣