Avatar
JackSons
da9e1099c29158d57df15c5a3e6708f170a615781f13ffacf32f52dea923b7ff
Father. Son. Husband. Protector. Provisioner. Bitcoiner. Mixed-media Martial Artist. Proof of Work family man.đŸȘ†
Replying to Avatar Beautyon

No, definitely doubt.

Fallacy: Middle Ground

Also Known as: Golden Mean Fallacy, Fallacy of Moderation

Description of Middle Ground

This fallacy is committed when it is assumed that the middle position between two extremes must be correct simply because it is the middle position. This sort of "reasoning" has the following form:

Position A and B are two extreme positions.

C is a position that rests in the middle between A and B.

Therefore C is the correct position.

This line of "reasoning" is fallacious because it does not follow that a position is correct just because it lies in the middle of two extremes. This is shown by the following example. Suppose that a person is selling his computer. He wants to sell it for the current market value, which is $800 and someone offers him $1 for it. It would hardly follow that $400.50 is the proper price.

This fallacy draws its power from the fact that a moderate or middle position is often the correct one. For example, a moderate amount of exercise is better than too much exercise or too little exercise. However, this is not simply because it lies in the middle ground between two extremes. It is because too much exercise is harmful and too little exercise is all but useless. The basic idea behind many cases in which moderation is correct is that the extremes are typically "too much" and "not enough" and the middle position is "enough." In such cases the middle position is correct almost by definition.

It should be kept in mind that while uncritically assuming that the middle position must be correct because it is the middle position is poor reasoning it does not follow that accepting a middle position is always fallacious. As was just mentioned, many times a moderate position is correct. However, the claim that the moderate or middle position is correct must be supported by legitimate reasoning.

Examples of Middle Ground

Some people claim that God is all powerful, all knowing, and all good. Other people claim that God does not exist at all. Now, it seems reasonable to accept a position somewhere in the middle. So, it is likely that God exists, but that he is only very powerful, very knowing, and very good. That seems right to me.

Congressman Jones has proposed cutting welfare payments by 50% while Congresswoman Shender has proposed increasing welfare payments by 10% to keep up with inflation and cost of living increases. I think that the best proposal is the one made by Congressman Trumple. He says that a 30% decrease in welfare payments is a good middle ground, so I think that is what we should support.

A month ago, a tree in Bill's yard was damaged in a storm. His neighbor, Joe, asked him to have the tree cut down so it would not fall on Joes new shed. Bill refused to do this. Two days ago another storm blew the tree onto Joe's new shed. Joe demanded that Joe pay the cost of repairs, which was $250. Bill said that he wasn't going to pay a cent. Obviously, the best solution is to reach a compromise between the two extremes, so Bill should pay Joe $125 dollars.

https://web.archive.org/web/20220718203642/http://nizkor.com/features/fallacies/middle-ground.html

Fair enough. An off-handed conciliatory comet that is worth being called out for its laziness. Cheers.

Dario Robleto, 2008

You are a potential central point of failure for your ideas. Hence the reason ideas spread like viruses. They seek to protect themselves among the proximous, networking crowd.

#Nostr

Are your zaps?:

1) Monetary Flattery

2) Favor Purchasing

3) Virtue Signaling

4) Proof-of-Work Compensation

What is it that you personally seek to incentivize?

Yes, it’s a thin, edge-honed line that runs the middle. You have kids, and you will censor for their well-being if you haven’t already.

Interesting thought experiment to consider what makes family governance different from federal governance.

“Time parenting in the domestic domain” > “Timing perfect, indelible moments like your daughter’s ‘Sweet 16’ ”

#DecentralizedFathers

The fact that X’s “killer tweet” is sentient animal videos is both a testament to human innocence and a discouraging commentary on the moment.

Replying to Avatar Beautyon

Elon is correct in the ent in his Tweet.

Brazilians are under no obligation to obey foreign laws, just as Americans are not obligated to obey foreign laws. Andrew Torba is way ahead of Elon in this.

Elon is also at liberty to publish secret documents about Brazilian government corruption; that is his right.

Is Elon about to become the next Julian Assange? I doubt it.

Having said all of this, Elon doesn't seem to be able to make the connection between government censorship and Bitcoin.

Bitcoin is "Censorship Resistant Money". If you look at Bitcoin through this lens, it is obvious that adding Bitcoin to X would have been a genius move.

Not only would Bitcoin solve the problem of Starlink having its accounts frozen but would have many beneficial effects on a global scale.

The ability of any government anywhere to sanction or block payments to and from X and Starlink users would be eliminated.

Overnight, X would become the most important (and largest) financial institution the world has ever seen, and it would be a tremendous force for good.

The billions of unbanked people would suddenly be able to save, send and spend money; an unprecedented event with multiple order effects that no one can fully grasp.

In the long and short term, Bitcoin is good for Elon and good for everyone on Earth who believes in Democracy.

Why then, does Elon shun this manifestly obvious checkmate move?

Andrew Torba of Gab has partially embraced Bitcoin.

Jack Dorsey has gone 100% Bitcoin with Bitkey.

David Marcus has gone 100% Bitcoin.

How is it that Elon cannot see this? How is it that he thinks Bitcoin is a joke?

Your guess is as good as mine.

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1829772614614536537

Perhaps that is ultimately his greatest genius. His ability to obscure the incentives that drive him.

The human mind has a hard time conceptualizing the ostensibly infinite.

In short, mind clutter.

Some aren’t willing to pay the maintenance and storage costs of such a valuable asset.

Grandfather, your time came and went back from whence it came.

It belongs to your sons and daughters now.

Father, you work for your family, but will you work for your House?

#DecentralizedFathers

Father, what are you doing to ensure that your House stands unto eternity?

#DecentralizedFathers

#Bitcoin

#Nostr

This father has to advocate for children and families no matter where they are in the decentralized world.

Stop the Israeli destruction of Palestinian family capital.

#DecentralizedFathers