Avatar
YeOldeHodler [OLD ACCOUNT SEE PROFILE FOR NEW NPUB]
de8ef91036c0d79596b65fef304cd759d4aabbd8c653b29077c0dccb32e4e9ef
#Bitcoin freak Anarchist without adjectives. Freedom maximalist. Building @Bija Nostr Client Slowly ending activity on this account and moving over to npub1qqqqqqqut3z3jeuxu70c85slaqq4f87unr3vymukmnhsdzjahntsfmctgs, hope to see you there!

I haven't tried this but it may be possible to run it in a linux container with docker on Windows.

Oh! PMSL!

Well, I've got nothing against penis's but my reasoning for the name is below:

Bija is a Sanskrit term - commonly used in both Buddhism and Hinduism - and means origin, root, or seed. One of its most common uses is referring to a 'seed' syllable, sound, or mantra.

The symbol used on the bija logo below is for the seed syllable 'hum'. This mantra may be used by a yogi or vedantin wanting to work with their ability to communicate as it is associated with speech (so they may meditate on it or chant the sound for example).

So you could see it as a mantra for 'freedom of speech'.

It requires a cloudinary account at the moment and can be configured on the settings page.

I think if you're using the latest binary it will show the image upload option on the posts form. That's a mistake, it's only supposed to show the option if it's been configured.

Ooh, this looks good actually! I've set it up on bija so that you can connect a cloudinary account and then you can add images directly whey you compose a post. May add this as an option too, looks simpler and easier. Cloudinary is prob overkill for most people.

the social media network where speech is so free everyone even has there own pronunciation of the name 🀣

It's funny because thousands of people who never heard of nostr just saw the name for the first time in that tweet 🀣

The last metadata I have for you is timestamped at around 3 hours ago and has an empty image tag ;)

{"id": "aac61ed405b9b4e540d35265001d79a270a69c577d85a244b610bc9c690aa371", "pubkey": "6389be6491e7b693e9f368ece88fcd145f07c068d2c1bbae4247b9b5ef439d32", "created_at": 1671335426, "kind": 0, "tags": [], "content": "{\"name\":\"NunyaBidness\",\"picture\":\"\",\"about\":\"I identify as a Curmudgeonly Bastard #Bitcoin Apache Attack Helicopter\\n\\nPronouns: Thee / Thou / Sire / m'Lord / m'Leige \\n\\nHost of the Bitcoin And . . . Podcast\"}", "sig": "b0d0cea256641c63c149456190a751a0278e537fa9da79a7d56f2ca333c36b6a9a5b648b71a4c6091eec276e8d9dba3e077bc7646dc021296401a6cc47c77908"}

True, although I think it's implicitly clear having only the reply tag too. ie. if there's only one of either reply or root it implies there's only one post further up the chain.

It's probably best that everyone does it the same way though and I think root does make more sense.

The positional e-tags are a pain, unfortunately it seems like quite a few people are still using them. I've run in to issues trying to differentiate them from other kinds of posts.