Avatar
9sirtom5
df359d2c9a2a62c0d1728c62bcc05466aabb40927a321a7750b228000a776c84
Meh

Děti podle státu rozhodně nejsou lidi, s nějakými právy. Prostě se je patří mlátit, dle libosti.

https://www.novinky.cz/clanek/krimi-seniorka-na-ulici-zfackovala-cizi-dite-podle-uradu-jen-prestupek-za-petistovku-40518166

Yeah. I get that. But still too many unknowns.

Firstly I expect in that situation that public goods solutions will exists on commercial basis (roads etc).

Then you're left with charity basically.

And In that case we are back to what I mentioned before, who, how, why.

But if I would have to answer the question regardless all the uncertainty and so on?

I would aim around 10%.

Well, I think it's impossible to answer this question. Especially honestly.

In real life situation this would depend on so many factors...

Who is asking, how is asking, for which specific issue etc. etc.

Just think when you gave some money for some charity or similar project. Was it whim because the volume was super low? Was is some emotional story of sick child?

Was it some project which you crowdfunded because it made sense to you...

I'm not surprised by the fact she ate it.

But why the hell hide the empty box? Just throw it away 🤷.

I'm gonna stop you right there.

Well, I basically agree with you.

I do not have the answer.

Just a comment - sure the state was created as a tool for wealthy to rule. But nowadays the situation is far more complex (I wish we would be in situation of some early state in terms of politics, where it was quite clear, who is who a doing what and why :D).

The main question for me is how to make (even small things) less centralized, less monopolized etc.

In other words at this point, where state engages in every and all aspects of my life I don`t care about philosophical, hypothetical question about future in hundred year or so (or better not that much care).

Sure it is beneficial to discuss undelaying philosophy, but I`m not the right person for it, I take more pragmatic approach I guess.

I agree with that.

But I think the same game theory also dictates there will be many forces in play, opposing, having different interest etc.

I think you underestimate how huge role in anything in today's world play state monopoly, so applying today's logic/examples is a bit tricky.

For me the much bigger question is actually how to reduce state monopoly,, otherwise this is just nice theoretical exercise.

Life is though sometimes.

You mean few piecea of it where the speed is not lowered to 80-110 because of environment and/or the road conditions are utterly horrible?

Yeah, those few pieces were great.

One side of imaginary line drawn on paper: Drive with kids to holidays.

Other side of imaginary line drawn on paper: Criminal offense, endangering everything and everyone, punishable with stealing your car and forbidding to drive.

So, good morning in etatism, I guess.