There was a question at the start that was like:"which of these have you done in the past year:" buy a yacht, house ,Bitcoin, pay YouTube subscription" or something like that. I think it was just to detect bots maybe? Or maybe they want the yacht too

After cold storage question, it was what devices (ledger, bitkey,coldcard) you use and how % of total you put on each one.

After cold storage question, it was what devices (ledger, bitkey,coldcard) you use and how % of total you put on each one.

Do you remember the questions? I filled out a couple but got bounced when I replied “None” to how much BTC I withdrew to cold storage monthly

Now that I've had coffee, I'm pretty sure it was a scam and my groggy self thought I could get 10$.

Now I'm wondering if I should alert anyone living at my old address to be aware of possible burglars.

I’m convinced the primary motivation behind publishing articles like this is to intentionally provoke

These guys literally can not stop lying.

Why does the entire filing keep mentioning Swan “and its customer” if it was a reserve account?

Better yet why does the filing focus on fiduciary duty arguments if this filing doesn’t pertain to swans customers?

Looks and sounds like Swan customers got burnt and Swan had to fill the hole with corporate funds to stick to the story “no customers affected”

Anyone familiar with how to resolve a “Claimed value length too large” error in sparrow? nostr:npub1hea99yd4xt5tjx8jmjvpfz2g5v7nurdqw7ydwst0ww6vw520prnq6fg9v2

Ross posts.

if you're argument is it's a slippery slope thats valid. I'm not going to sit here and argue for mass murders and rapists that be spared. I'm just not

some people deserve it, sorry

What a photo.

Society got taken away from families so that faggots and whores can feel safe.

#MasculineFrame