Global Feed Post Login
e2
Blatz
e28b7db671f22031a55dcb68d071b46fbd7000b3c8aa089fe1e6874575cb2956
Replying to Avatar jb55

Should we make this shirt?

h/t nostr:npub12gyrpse550melzx2ey69srfxlyd8svkxkg0mjcjkjr4zakqm2cnqwa3jj5

e2
Blatz 2y ago

No. That's not thinking different. That's copying someone else.

Replying to Avatar erik

Ever since I started designing for Bitcoin eCash wallets, I've noticed something: Getting eCash feels like there's this extra step the user has to complete: Swapping sats via lightning for eCash. I heard this comparison on the Bitcoin Review podcast once – imagine eCash is like poker chips at a casino. It kind of clicked. We give dollars, get chips; give sats, get eCash. Wondering how to best frame this to the end user. Abstract this extra step away or embrace it? What to name it? "Topping up"? "Exchanging"? I like the erm "exchange" because it suggests a two-way process. Users can convert sats to eCash and vice versa.

e2
Blatz 2y ago

Users should be able to set preferences for the amount or percentage that the wallet automatically balances to.

Load More