Today I feel a deep moral solitude.
As if the whole world goes directly to a sinkhole, and the only question to ask every other clueless imbecile passing by is:
“Do you like hurting other people?” 
- Bitcoin? It’s to volatile for me, I prefer an approach with less risk, or at least something that has practical use for our world’s current challenges.
- Like what?
- Like OpenAI or NVid… AHHHHHHHH HEELP 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥OH GOD PLEASE NO 💥💥💥💥💥THE PAIN! 😩😩AAHGHHHHHH 🌊🌊🌊IT’S UNBEARABLE 📉📉🔥🔥🔥
BRING DREAD PIRATE ROGERS TO NOSTR RIGHT **THE FUCK** NOW.
#rossulbricht
Ross was pardoned, I am so happy right now 🥲.
Because I wanted rapidly try many framing configurations, so instead of bashing my head against Photoshop... I wrote some code.
I did the framing code, and built the polyptych, the image is from a Chinese artist that goes by the name JLIEN: https://pixiv.net/users/12572640
Cleaning up my laptop from old projects I found this smol proggy to crate polyptychs I made back in 2017 and decided to publish it.
Back then I found an Abyss Watcher's image I loved, and wrote my 'framer' to create this for my living room.
Enjoy stupid Haskell code: https://github.com/RowDaBoat/framer
🫡Hope all gets solved.
Users owe you nothing. You cannot mandate them to “know what’s happening”. You cannot expect them to not be alienated from the production process.
This is not a matter of morals, it’s a matter of you hurting your own business.
By discussing morality and how harsh feedback causes stress (it really does), instead of getting to the point and gettin actual information, you are actually losing two battles at the same time.
As a token of good will: I never used YH, I’ll download it later today and see what happens on my end.
I mean, yeah, “uninstalling that shit” is a bit mean. But reacting this way to a rant? To a user’s rant? Believe me that is not such a good idea.
Users being harsh and having valuable information are not mutex. Maybe it’s your first time shipping to users… in that case, welcome to software development 😁.
Qué pasó querido? Te mando un abrazo por dónde andes.
Also OpenBSD is amazing.
Simple, efficient, reliable, philosophically correct.
If only I could run Docker with linux images efficiently it would be my main system.
It's GLSL, GPU shader code. Try the link!
Today I'm posting a long-form note explaining this weird stuff and what I intend to do.
I completely agree 😄.
Well, the fire poker argument was on absolute ethical norms: Popper said there were, LVW said that there weren’t.
So by what you’re saying you’re pretty much already aware of how it went: Popper trolled Wittgenstein, and he got (reasonably) mad and stormed away. Which is a win in my eyes, since Popper was not intending to collaborate, just doing silly nit-picking.
Knowledge (scientific or not) requires a priori assumptions, denying that not all valuable information comes from reasoning is… silly in itself... and easily falsified.
Ruth is giving me too much credit, I just provided the “tolerance paradox” concept by Popper.
Empiricists are based by definition, meaning only those that do not deviate from Popper’s falsification method, then of course their view on statism may be just contradictions and biases.
But I very much think that Ludwig Wittgenstein actually won the famous “fire poker” argument against Popper.
What did he do now?
I mean besides sucking some serious CIA dick.