Avatar
david
e5272de914bd301755c439b88e6959a43c9d2664831f093c51e9c799a16a102f
neurologist and freedom tech maxi Co-founder @ NosFabrica 🍇 Grapevine, 🧠⚡️Brainstorm

#100aDayUntil100k

#100aDayTil100k

Days 19 and 20 ✅✅

I forgot to post yesterday but I def did them! Added some squats and pull ups for good measure 😎

The term grok was coined by Robert Heinlein for his book Stranger in a Strange Land — it has been stated, if I recall correctly, that the book is basically an extended definition of the term. 😄

Pretty Good Freedom Tech

pgf.tech

LFG nostr:note1umt6f8x7q59pkwh5pdfeyth2q7shq7vj79hxe5zsnzg2d89rhdxqtf5ama

#100aDayUntil100k

#100aDayTil100k

Day 18 ✔️😊

Replying to Avatar david

Hi Daniel - if you go to DCoSL.com I have links to several resources, including the tapestry protocol which I’m in the process of rewriting and various blog posts and essays at various stages of completion on habla, substack, github. nostr:npub1p2uwv7qme2u92y2qcpqqvafhkkqsxfrrnz8m79lm60v4005s7vuqnexr0s is rebuilding a proof of concept from my desktop app Pretty Good Apps (specifically, the Curated Lists section) as a webapp. There are a few of us discussing these ideas in discord and I can give you an invite if you’d like to join us :-)

My vision of web of trust is that it’s not enough for WoT to curate content, facts and information. WoT must simultaneously curate the very digital languages we use to communicate about those things. The reason WoT has never lived up to expectations is that we have never even really tried to do that. But it can definitely be done. Just gonna take some work.

Here’s a recent post of mine describing a bit about how I envision web of trust to find the users and content we’re looking for without getting distracted by the cult of the social media “influencer”.

https://prettygoodproject.substack.com/p/the-pretty-good-way-to-calculate

Hi Daniel - if you go to DCoSL.com I have links to several resources, including the tapestry protocol which I’m in the process of rewriting and various blog posts and essays at various stages of completion on habla, substack, github. nostr:npub1p2uwv7qme2u92y2qcpqqvafhkkqsxfrrnz8m79lm60v4005s7vuqnexr0s is rebuilding a proof of concept from my desktop app Pretty Good Apps (specifically, the Curated Lists section) as a webapp. There are a few of us discussing these ideas in discord and I can give you an invite if you’d like to join us :-)

#100aDayUntil100k

#100aDayTil100k

Day 17 ✅

#100aDayUntil100k

#100aDayTil100k

Day 16 ✔️

Your comment got me thinking: the point of the tapestry protocol is for a community of users to work with their WoT to curate a decentralized digital language. In many ways, it’s modeled after the way real life works. Importantly, no one is required to have a bird’s eye view of the entire community or of all the attestations, or even to know how many users are part of the group. In fact, now that I think some more about it, communication with a small handful of peers is all that is technically required. We’ve been curating spoken languages that way for millennia, and the tapestry protocol just takes what we already do and implements it digitally.

My curated lists prototype doesn’t make the above feature evident, bc in the prototype, all attestations are public and so everyone does in fact have a bird’s eye view of everyone’s score for the curation of each list. So now I’m wondering what’s the minimal amount of the tapestry protocol that I can implement that will make the above feature evident, ie the fact that it allows us to build consensus on some question without anyone having a bird’s eye view. 🤔

#100aDayUntil100k

#100aDayTil100k

Day 15 ✅

A decentralized language is nothing more than a long list of arbitrary-ish questions that are answered by your web of trust.

Example:

Q: what shall we use to indicate the timestamp on a nostr note?

Some reasonable answers:

created_at

createdAt

CreatedAt

Most of us don’t care all that much, as long as we’re all on the same page. The web of trust method is that I’ll do whatever my closest frens are doing. Take a simple weighted average of what my inner circle of friends think, and created_at is the winner by a mile!

And that’s the tapestry method / protocol in a nutshell. The Concept Graph is a simple protocol to ask questions and the Grapevine is a simple protocol to answer them.

It’s what we already do in real life. But by making it digital, we will scale Dunbar’s number from 150 to 8 billion.

Eating a high carb and high sugar diet does not promote diabetes.

Eating a low carb diet does not reverse or prevent diabetes.

Shocking, I know. Here me out. The common and popular understanding about what is going on isn't quite right.

For the purposes of this discussion, I will define diabetes as an impairment to your ability to rapidly and effectively process blood glucose, should glucose happen to enter your blood stream.

You might have diabetes even if you eat a zero-carb diet. You wouldn't know. Because without eating sugars you can't tell if your body is good at processing those sugars. All the nasty symptoms and damage caused by diabetes will be absent while you don't eat sugars, which is great. But once you start eating sugars again you could find that your body cannot tolerate them.

Diabetes is caused by two things: (1) visceral fat that has invaded your pancreas, and (2) beta cells that are not very fat tolerant (this is genetically determined). If your pancreatic beta cells are not very fat tolerant, and you have a tendency to store fat viscerally, then you will become diabetic at perhaps a low body weight, maybe even at 25 BMI. You drew the short straw. Some people have very tolerant beta cells and store fat subcutaneously and can get up to massive BMIs without becoming diabetic. Everybody has a personal body weight over which they will become diabetic that is mostly genetically determined and not known to be changeable.

What happens with diabetes is that as the pancreas becomes more and more fatty, the beta cells can't tolerate the fattyness of the environment and stop behaving like beta cells. They don't die, they are still there, but they cease operation.

The good news is that if you lose weight, those beta cells will resume operation and your diabetes will be cured.

So going back to my initial statements, it isn't about carbs or fat or protein in your food. It is about total energy consumption, total body weight. Becuase your body converts excess carbs into fat, and it converts excess protein into fat too. And if you eat in excess, eventually your pancreas will become too fatty for your beta cells.

People think sugars/carbs cause diabetes probably because diabetics can't tolerate sugars. But carbs only cause diabetes if you eat them to excess, causing you to become overweight and your pancreas to become fatty. You can do this to yourself by overeating protein too.

People think a low-carb diet cures diabetes, but this is only if that diet causes you to lose weight below your diabetic threshold. It also happens to mask diabetes since you aren't eating sugars so you really can't tell if your beta cells are working or not while you are on the diet.

This post was informed by research done at Newcastle University.

Type 1 diabetes is caused by failure of the pancreas to produce insulin, typically caused by destruction of beta cells by the immune system. This is not the kind that’s caused by diet.

Type 2 diabetes is caused by (or defined as) insulin resistance, meaning that the cells of your body stop responding properly to insulin. It’s not primarily caused by dysfunction of the pancreas, although there can be secondary pathological effects on the pancreas. Diet is a big contributing factor. If someone is well fed all the time, then the insulin levels in the blood are always high and never drop to zero. The fact that cells become insulin resistant could be related to the fact they have been swimming in high levels of insulin for as long as they can remember. Fasting will drop your insulin level to basically zero after maybe 18-24 hours (or longer depending on activity level). If your cells have forgotten what it feels like to exist without high levels of insulin around, that’s probably not a good thing, and fasting / decreasing carbs in your diet will probably improve insulin resistance.

He did a very good job.

But I’m waiting for people like him to start talking about financing warfare as the primary use case of fiat. Like 2/3 of British bonds for WW1 were secretly paid for by the central bank. And I’m pretty sure the military industrial complex prefers fiat for their money laundering.

Imagine if we wake up one day to find Satoshi is alive and has signed the following message.

🤘🏻PV everyone! In case you were wondering, I’m still here and I still have access to all my coins. And I know what I’m gonna do with them. In one year, one of two things is going to happen:

1. I send them all to a burn address.

2. The US Congress (and President), passes a set of laws (and signs a series of executive orders) which accomplish the following: end the Federal Reserve, eliminate all legal tender laws, and forbid the issuance of new fiat denominated debt by the US Treasury. If that happens, I pledge all my coins to be used to pay off all outstanding US debt, at whatever dollar-to-bitcoin ratio that will use up all coins and pay off the entire debt.

How would that play out, I wonder?

Day 14 ✅ nostr:note15nmw4fvaqlmsx4scyhp0ukehat5lgmwwkgy4dkkfcc24gfdkhufsvtcxct