Avatar
chanoch ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡ธ
e6c3014b475dd2559edcd51c5db35e9ca8b56d2525f89a38f38d0a8f0f02b69a
ื‘ืกืดื“

There's a podcast here in Brazil called "Fala Glauber," which is really good and I recommend it. I don't know if it has any visibility for non-speakers of the language, but it brings very interesting people.

Thank G-d, abortion from the 22nd week of pregnancy has finally become a crime here in Brazil.

However, by the Torah, From the 41st day onwards, the soul enters the fetus's body, making it a living being. This is because, from that moment on, the woman is called โ€œmotherโ€ (ืื, whose number value is 41). Humanity is not yet ready for this wisdom.

--

https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/5678558/jewish/When-Does-the-Soul-Enter-the-Body.htm

Note: Hebrew letters have numerical values called Gematria, as if A were 1, B were 2, etc.

Monopoly is and always has been the problem. All ideologies and political philosophies hate monopoly. Most political and economic ideologies arose as a reaction to some kind of monopolyโ€”be it economic, political, religious, or power-based. But each defines "monopoly" differently.

The liberal hates state monopoly; the socialist hates private monopoly; the anarchist hates both; the fascist hates individual monopoly and wants collective monopoly under the state etc.

What all these currents have in common is their rejection of power concentrated in a single entityโ€”be it the state, the market, a social class, a religion, or an individual. The basis of this is the distrust of the concentration of power. As Montesquieu said, โ€œEvery man who has power is tempted to abuse it.โ€

All serious political ideologies arise from a critique of the monopoly of power โ€”but they differ completely on: who holds the power and who should control it.

Epistemologically, all political ideologies derive from a view of power (Foucault, Weber). What is more, monopoly breeds inefficiency and abuse (Smith, Ricardo, Hayek, Marx in opposite directions) and the concentration of power threatens freedom and justice (Montesquieu, Locke, Kant).

And thatโ€™s exactly what Zionism is. Itโ€™s an attempt to substitute nationalism for everything else โ€“ for commandments, for Torah and even for G-d himself.

โ€” Rav Avigdor Miller, Tale #40 (October 1974)

By this time I think that our people here know the answer to that question. But to repeat: Zionism is a substitute for Judaism.

โ€” Rav Avigdor Miller, Tape #40 (October 1974)

I agree with everything you said, if we change โ€œJewsโ€ to โ€œZionistsโ€. Not only are Jews not animals, but the men who contributed most to humanity were Jews.

We do not believe that non-Jews are animals. They are human beings made in the image of the Creator, blessed be He, just like the Jews. According to the Torah, we are all descendants of the same couple.

It is the atheists and heretics who insist that humans descended from apes. In that case, it would make sense to distinguish humans by racial capacity. If they want to believe they are the grandchildren of monkeys, I think that says a lot.

I suggest you do a brief search in the following website, especially this section, which provides Jewish sources on loving and treating Gentiles well:

https://nkusa.org/sources/judaism-condemns-violence-and-injustice/

Zionism is not Judaism. On the contrary, Zionism and Judaism are diametrically opposed. Anyone who is willing to follow the will of the Creator, blessed be He, should not be in favor of rebellion against G-d's decree of Jewish exile.