Nostr -- at least the free, as in beer, version -- is really slow at 10 mbps connections. First world will never know.
I would prefer neuroevolution for our rogue AI. That leaves "drunk + Getter Robot opening = social media posts"
"Who wouldn't like to play as Jamila, the hairdresser, in a new Borderlands game?"
"But why would any dev start to do such a thing in the first place?"
A hypothetical scenario: Because they believe that anyone who disagrees with their political beliefs is a Nazi and should be silenced
"Why would users addopt it secondly?"
Because they are the best clients technically, and these users do not really care about politics. They are just normal people who want to use social media.
Yes, you can fork the clients, but non-political people don't care enough to switch to your fork.
I'm not saying these things are happening right now. I'm just saying that a scenario similar to this is possible. There is nothing in the nostr protocol to prevent this. I really hope I'm wrong.
No, I don't want to talk to people that don't want to listen. I want the users to be able to see my posts by default and decide for themselves. Instead, in the fediverse situation, for example, the default for the mainstream servers is to block all right-wingers. This is not true yet for nostr, but I'm afraid that it is possible via a client "nostrblock".
This sounds like "you can make your own server" on fedi. Ok I can, but if all the people use the large ones, and they all block my server then effectively I'm censored. In the same way, if no one is using my nostr client fork most users won't see my posts.
Germans get the fuck out of Germany
So if all major nostr clients decide to adopt a shared blocklist to ban "the Nazis" wouldn't we have a situation worse than fediblock?
