Thoughts on this chart? Looking a bit like a shitcoin to me

Even bigger nostrich head and beak patten forming on the 2-hr. Very, very powerful technical indicator

Today I learned that the generations before me are already bitcoiners, they just may or may not know it yet. Within the past two months, have helped my parents, in-laws, aunts, and uncles set up Cash App accounts as well as Muun wallets.

They are so excited to learn 🫂

False

That man is 100% weak and lost.

💯

Guess so, but I’m connected to a bunch of high quality relays.

Good night, fellow plebs.

😴🛌👋

Скорее всего я нагнетаю, но по-моему apple первый раз дал мне годный совет

… Сторонники АЭШ поймут

Yep ded

I was once chided by a West African colleague for failing to recognize how much economic value 6 kids would bring me in 20 years.

The way I think about it, and this might be over-simplified, is that higher relative wealth tends to lower time preferences, and that crowds out high time preference things -- which having children is.

I know these correlations exist. But I don't have a deep understanding of the subject. I am interested in it, though.

Yep

#[2]

I think that might be true for some people. But I think the real paradox comes from the fact that with higher relative wealth, our time preference as a civilization shifts dramatically. This is why there is an inverse correlation between birth rate and relative purchasing power.

It's a real conundrum, I think.

I don't think I'd call it misanthropy, even though I agree it has that effect. I think people are deeply confused. Morally and intellectually.

My strong guess is that if Popper were alive today, he would be strongly inclined to believe that anthropogenic climate change was real based on the preponderance of empirical evidence, and the logical deductions that can be extracted from our understanding of quantum physics and thermodynamics. In particular, the thermal absorption properties of CO2 and methane, the strong correlation of temperature and CO2 levels in the geological record, exoplanetary science, etc.

IDK man, 2x thru Conj & Ref & Open Soc and I’m just …not sure my dumb view is wrong

It's not novel. Popper did not subscribe to strict positivism. He believed it made for a stronger theory.

Popper is one of my favorite philosophers, and anybody who has read him in detail would not be surprised by anything I'm saying.