lnbc10u1pjtnfqppp574k4fg5z5qhqfayhs797henvc5gfdr5t8v5vfanrdnkehxu9wmlqdqu2askcmr9wssx7e3q2dshgmmndp5scqzzsxqyz5vqsp5vw7l2v3n7ue7qgahf7u6ravgvpa30u95lfw4k4069ef7uc02cc2s9qyyssqv0c8zrllzqpt8k6ke3m0yxu8lgrye07wagxew660ap8yjd65f37j8ef8fxrggpkkvcxmvpx07ly9el47udu4g3czv53rwhp9pauzhaqpz72gj6
The impression, it finds you
Where it has been before 
Nosex could be good
primal.net/treesap
npub1aq69ynhpgxhncd47ml4dqfgdcs374vwn6g67axsuyt4u49ql84tqqw3pts
It’s good to know this
With a mind sympathetic to the ideals of DAO this observation is intriguing. Curious if you have noticed a pattern leading to regression
gratitude and mystery, #nostrica 
bits = floor((n/2) * log2(4) + ((n/3) * log2(4)))
I think it was a Mastercoin idea at first! Nevertheless, yes, I believe the DAO concept is pretty well associated to Ethereum.
Regarding the standards for naming NIPs that are the same number when leading zeros are removed.
That’s correct.
Whether a NIP kind 0123 is both valid and distinct from NIP kind 123.
(?) Question. Does NIP kind permit a leading zero for a symbolic purpose ~ i.e. 0123