Avatar
bitfox 🦊⚡
e8acdec1ee3168fe2849f31fef589e28cb04185d896af7a639b91557de1d4328
amateur photographer and shitposter // cant spell or read #thebestengineer @ theworsturl.wallet (yes, i got a free domain from coingecko)
Replying to Avatar corndalorian

so...can you send me 21 of those measurements that dont exist?

just to check 😁

last question then (thanks already in clearing some of my doubts)

silica transistors are about to become old tech?

how would rtsc affect the current tech? is lithography becoming old tech?

is tsmc with their current billions of dollars worth of tech in a position where they need to reinvent themselves (in a few decades) or is their expertise transferrable to the new materials?

understood but i think my core question remains

is there any usage of this type of material in a current generation chip?

might come out as a dumb question, "prototype material on a current gen system, are you stupid?"

i mean, gasoline is used in several different generations of engine, as an analogy, is there a material that would have physical properties similar to LK99 that has ever been paired to a silica chip?

which process was used to create that

my thought process is, carbon nanotubes are a mega advancement in material science, usage is still very limited due to how hard it is to manufacture in a usable state, is that something you would consider as a problem for LK99, its a mega material but manifacturing is very hard and manufacturing in a usable manner even harder

i hope i dont come out as too dumb 🤤

Replying to Avatar ⚡️🌱🌙

🚨 NOSTRFLASH 🚨

OK, there is a lot of news on various outlets about LK-99 and the ongoing race to validate/refute of 3 Koreans who claim to have created the world’s first room temperature superconductor.

I will give a quite info dump here.

1). WTF is this? Room temp superconductors (RTSC) are basically unobtainium. This is the stuff in the Avatar movie. It was calculated earlier this week that it would take an exascale machine (1x human is 20 petaflops) around 100 million years to brute force a 50:50 chance of discovering such a material. It’s a super hard problem.

2). Why do we care? Such a material can move electricity with zero resistance, this means no heat or waste from electronics. It means super dense chips, data centres without thermal limits, it means powerful enough magnets to hold proper fusion plasma, it means quantum computers with no thermal error, it means science instruments with no noise, zero loss transmission lines, vastly superior battery tech, proper ionic space engines.

That just some of the stuff we can predict today, there are no doubt many totally unforeseeable things too. It’s basically a completely new paradigm of human capabilities. It’s on par with humans discovering coal.

It means the 21st century will be unrecognisable compared to 20th century, as information and energy technologies are completely reset at a higher science foundation.

3). Is it real? Currently betting markets are 50:50 having been only 5-12% positive last week. The consensus is shifting towards “this is real” that’s not how these things usually go.

What do I know?

I have read the background and the science papers and spoken to a few people. I am the sort of person who reads patents as a hobby, have seen BS claims before. This looks real, has a new hypothesis that has been validated by world class simulation centre in Lawrence Bell Nation Labs, and various labs are now beginning to publish papers replicating physically what the Koreans claim.

My own theory is that the superconductor is a particular isotope of lead. Specifically Pb 207, only 22% of Lead is Pb-207 sI believe some enrichment may be required to achieve a pure RTSC. I expect various entities to race to construct such plants if this theory is confirmed. Why do I think this?

Because Lead-207 has unique nuclear spin properties among stable lead isotopes.

Isotopic properties.

Lead-204: Spin = 0

Lead-206: Spin = 0

Lead-207: Spin = 1/2

Lead-208: Spin = 0

Copper-63: Spin = 3/2

Copper-65: Spin = 3/2

Only 22.1% of Lead is 207.

My own theory is that RTSC is a macro phenomena of engineered quantum entanglement, where the spins of individual Pb-207 nuclei become entangled with each other. This could potentially influence the electron behavior on a macroscopic scale. This might aid in forming Cooper pairs, enabling superconductivity.

Any Questions?

how is this material paired with semiconductors to create the chips you mentioned (very dense ones)

current lithography machines use silica wafers, can this lead be placed inside a silica wafer with a coating and a lithography machine?

is there any example of lithography with lead?

you must not ask what nostr can do for you but what can you do for nostr. very famous quote from someone famous 😆

can you add value? you will gets tips for it

if you are useless like me, you still get some tips because people are that nice

i dont get the whole "which hardware wallet to buy" discussion

there is seedsigner and then there is everything else, quite simple

no, im saying 100$ is losable money for westernairs, and that will likely not break the bank

cant really say that on africa, south america and alot of asia

are any of these places poor? no, they are very rich places, just badly balanced and run/managed

that is true, LN is not on BTC main chain

similar polygon and several other L2s

let me put a few things straight

"there is no second best" is true, there is no other savings tech in crypto

you can grow your savings stack using other crypto

you are free to play the crypto game, you need to be a bit lucky to win but there are gains to be gained playing the btc/crypto game

would I rather have $10k in btc or any other crypto for 10 years and not be anlr to trade it? btc for sure

i think im not your usual maxi, i understand gambling is fun but i dont mix saving tech (btc) with gambling tech (crypto)

you can do whatever, but i think its hard to argue against that

🫂

a couple notes i would add

100$ in a costodial LN wallet isnt a big deal, for anyone on a western country

the only BTC i have that i dont custody is on my LN wallet

ordinals havent proven value yet (and they are quite recent)

NFTs arent new, they have no proven value yet...other than speculation on monkey images and other pfp stuff

i will wait for the utility that ordinals can add because for now, NFTs, not specifically ordinals, none of them have proven utility

wait, are you talking esg? earthbould resources are needed for everything.

i didnt say the tech was free (or should be, it shouldn't), having eth to stake or having hardware to mine POW is a requirement, both have pre requisites => this is good

regarding people choosing to use, dude, thats great, nothing against that

i dont know where you read from me that you shouldn't be able to buy worthless things, you should be able to buy worthless things

should you buy it? maybe not, but being able to buy? of course!

agree, but does eth offer "freedom" in its purest form?

POS will never be as freedom representing as POW

the exchanges can have as much btc as they want, they wont be able to censor btc transactions

can that be said about POS and ETH?

im not hating, is questioning the same as hating now?

lightning solves the payments tps it has utility, so i am not sure what do you mean when you say lightning is useless for most people. anyone that "accepts bitcoin payments" is using lightning

what is the use case for nfts right now?

and dont take this as hating, im not hating

i just dont start clapping to a new feature just because it exists

its not a with or against us type of topic, it needs to have utility before it gets applauds, do you agree with that at least?

but what does a jpeg on a satoshi add to the network other than memory space?

still dont get it, i get the tech, i dont get the utility

nfts on shitcoin networks have shown they are rather useless, no?

would you buy nfts in 2023?

real question bro

and how many planes were not blown up because the water was taken?