There are ones that are also Jewish. Saifedean is Muslim. Pretty sure there are Hindu and Buddhist Austrian economists too. So which way do we go now? My point was the original ideas were born from atheists because they go against religious teachings that require taxation and redistribution of wealth. They are Austrian economists despite their religious backgrounds not because of it. They are not the norm.

You said he revealed himself to thousands of people after his resurrection. That’s not true.

You seem like a nice guy but just not very smart. Here’s a tip for you to use in future arguments. Before you make a claim, make sure that your opponent can’t use the same argument to make the opposite claim against you. Saying that your religion is right because a book said so isn’t very different from saying your religion is wrong because a book said so. If you have evidence provide it yourself. There are historians that have argued Jesus never even existed lmao search that on Google and you’ll see plenty of books on the subject. If you just tell me to read this book, then you’re putting the burden of proof on me. That’s like accusing someone of a crime and expecting them to prove their innocence. You made a claim about your religion and then told me to read a book for evidence. Well I’m telling you to read the countless books that prove Jesus never existed. See how this isn’t productive?

Instead of telling me to read a book, you should give me the evidence yourself. Give me some proof. Give me a logical explanation as to why I should believe you. But there isn’t any. I know there isn’t because I’ve talked with countless other religious people that know a lot more than you. They try to make logical arguments then eventually fall back and say it’s faith: pray to god and he will show you the way. 😴

And yeah I pointed you to a blog because i told you I didn’t read a book on the subject. Are you autistic or something? Lmao why would I waste my time reading all these books when there is a fundamental flaw with all religions. They are all illogical and based on faith. So there is no objective rational way to pick the right one. If you think I’m wrong prove it yourself. If not then move on.

Historically it has been the opposite. The Austrian economists were atheists and religions have always required their followers to pay taxes to the church and redistribute wealth to the poor. “Oh you’re not one of us? Burn him alive!” I believe there’s a misunderstanding of history among these people. They romanticize the past as if it was a better time. A time when slavery was common and women were property. Why doesn’t religion end these things? Nobody talks about this dirty side.

I don't understand or like it that it has now become a staple of bitcoin culture to be deeply christian or spiritual. Not all liberty minded people are religious, and not all atheists are commies.

Every argument you have made, has been made by other religions

Testimonials from Christ’s friends are also not evidence 😂

There are witness testimonials of Muhammad ascending to the heavens. Why don’t you be Muslim?

Hallucinations are not evidence. Other religions have similar things, try again 😴

I’ve done enough research and there is no evidence. Prove me wrong.

I’ve done enough research and there is no evidence. Prove me wrong.

You’re assuming a lot of things. You don’t know me or how much I’ve already explored in this topic. At this point I’m entertaining myself by destroying your horrible argument 😂

But I always keep an open mind that someone may have a different perspective or actual evidence. Not from you of course but maybe op has actual evidence. I’ve tried plenty of spiritual things with no benefit. And people like you typically end up gaslighting people like me by saying I need to pray harder or put my heart into it.

Also you’re making baseless outlandish claims without providing evidence. You should stop doing that it really makes your arguments weak. Where is the evidence that ALL great thinkers explore matters of the soul? That evidence is likely impossible to gather. And what does it matter if ALL of them don’t arrive at the same conclusion? A lot of them don’t even believe in God so your argument can literally be used to disprove your stance. All these great thinkers said it’s useless and didn’t work for them. I don’t even have to disprove any of your claims I can just flip them and throw them back at you 😂

Quotes from the Bible are not evidence of anything. Anyone can write a book full of stories lmao give me evidence why I should believe this over the thousands of other religions. “My ancient book said so” is not evidence.

That’s not evidence, those are unverified opinions. Give me actual evidence and facts.

It doesn’t matter how it’s derived, it’s the same thing. If you need to verify then you don’t trust it lmao. Trust, but verify is not different from don’t trust, verify. In both statements, verification is required for trust. You just keep saying more retarded shit 😴

If only there was a church that has been around 2000 years with books and resources to explore such topics…

You’re the one parroting the same “Don’t trust, verify” line as if it is gospel. You do realized it’s derived from “doveryay, no proveryay” right?! But I’m the dumbass/NPC. Got it.

If you explored every single recommendation that everyone offered to you, you’d never have time to actually live your life. So asking for clarification is reasonable. Since you can’t clarify, I will assume you don’t actually know why you think it’s a good idea. Best of luck to you NPC 🫡

I’ve done my research but op claimed something different. So I asked for clarification then your dumbass came in and started telling me to do my own research. Burden of proof lies with the person making the claim.

Are you okay in the head?

That’s what I’m doing. I asked him why instead of just trusting him.