Sale prices this morning

Bitcoin deserves its own emoji:

https://chng.it/Ssqnvkg9WC

SAME 🤙

nostr:npub1guh5grefa7vkay4ps6udxg8lrqxg2kgr3qh9n4gduxut64nfxq0q9y6hjy nostr:npub1qny3tkh0acurzla8x3zy4nhrjz5zd8l9sy9jys09umwng00manysew95gx On the latest RHR, you played an out of context judiciary hearing clip and claimed there were two Supreme Court nominees being discussed. You actually said it was the nominee to replace RGB. A quick google search would tell you that vacancy was filled by Amy Coney Barrett in 2021. It was highly controversial because she was appointed after Trump lost the election, before Biden was sworn in.

There are currently no openings on the Supreme Court. So, probably not your best material for making “clown world” points.

My favorite movie.

Nah. Politicians can go elsewhere

Banks are crashing so people are selling their bitcoin? 🤔

Have been reading a lot and listening to podcasts about AI. Mostly, it’s quite scary. An arms race between tech companies and none of them understand how their own AI models even work.

So it’s led me to wonder, if AI takes over, what does that mean for Bitcoin? Is Bitcoin’s cryptography strong enough to withstand an AI hive mind? I have no doubt that a self-aware AGI model could take over all electronic fiat banking if it wanted to.

(Maybe it doesn’t matter because if an AGI decided it would be better off without humans around, we’re all screwed anyways.)

Moving cash on ACH with 1-3 day delays feels so primitive.

There have been and will continue to be new social networks. But the creation of bitcoin is not repeatable.

I think it will happen as well. The building I work in is about 40% occupied. Was probably 95% before the pandemic. Once the long term leases expire, building owners will have to accept further losses or look to convert for residential or other usage.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/03/11/upshot/office-conversions.html?unlocked_article_code=7-MNSyM99YuAkJ6O129ZEvuhem73wrjhh-9Y38ObvEHMZrbGH6VJRxStci8dcgCLAhV1lHld0HimglpZ67whrnqOVixWzzz8uvKexSRnQMxhqQXzh2MhStqHHRLVAtVOjNnsNdbvUuGf4MultLQOJje5edtNewuWXJRu7s74GHTA53nbXcjZvqOcqUomU2NEIggVrPjAqr1pmdfcoZwc2sJ27xU_kjc_CWXtPTbOtEaK2X_UepDfM3bh2V6gavTyPvPrcBU1PuPEI4oMfkSUO1MjN58Q2RVonjhTh8jt5ZyHBowcqAf-vmWLB8IfrEsLqlV23bSltoHKyJgt7JnquWl7yvBcpoEIzHbr&smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

No, he’s correct. If your desire is mass bitcoin adoption, we need existing financial institutions to help facilitate that, especially for institutional buyers.

Or if you want bitcoin to remain niche, then sure, market make on Damus.

Makes sense. Thank you.

Please elaborate, would like to understand why. Have found you to be very knowledgeable.

Is Signature Bank connected to some of the NY based bitcoin companies?

Aeropress makes the best coffee

Maybe one day the guy will understand that with bitcoin there’s no need for a bank run in the first place, if you keep your own keys.

I only joined twitter a few years ago to learn more about bitcoin. Nostr is an upgrade for that.

Ordinals are maybe interesting. Mostly quixotic. Potentially good early example of building on bitcoin.

But- do they just make bitcoin more complicated and hard for new adopters to understand?

It looks great on Damus