United states is dangerous as Australia
nostr:npub1r89lejecvj7q25pqsf9ed63exe3rp3cezdkudk0fr7dwklde6gsqvqs5dt You know what, it might be Southern Swiss too. Now I remember they have some weird Germanic-Italian-Romanian language there
Likely Canton of Ticino.
nostr:npub1r89lejecvj7q25pqsf9ed63exe3rp3cezdkudk0fr7dwklde6gsqvqs5dt Map of Switzerland cantons.
nostr:npub1r89lejecvj7q25pqsf9ed63exe3rp3cezdkudk0fr7dwklde6gsqvqs5dt You know what, it might be Southern Swiss too. Now I remember they have some weird Germanic-Italian-Romanian language there
Likely Canton of Ticino.
nostr:npub1r89lejecvj7q25pqsf9ed63exe3rp3cezdkudk0fr7dwklde6gsqvqs5dt The first word looks Italian. The second one looks German.
Maybe it's Austrian or Northern Italy (Südtirol)
Another photo, 2048x2048
Finally fixed SDXL for my videocard, damn, so much time wasted training a proper miopen cache
Democrats do not understand what Democracy actually means, they are just a soft variant of Totalitarianism.
White people have no culture :reee:
nostr:npub1hye323nnrzdelu2zy3862rf2et50c3kvp29nqk59klfts363hktqvlfr7p I'm an anarchist who sympathies with Monarchy and fully disagree with violent revolution.
Kings are just like any other parasite from government but easier to deal with. The Democratic Republican parasites have a whole system made to prevent people complaining against their paedophilia, luxury and degeneracy.
nostr:npub1hye323nnrzdelu2zy3862rf2et50c3kvp29nqk59klfts363hktqvlfr7p That doesn't and never worked. Again, you are acting like any other leftoid. People doesn't change because "the law" says it, no matter how much force you apply.
Get some kids and you will understand how to reason with people 🤭
nostr:npub1hye323nnrzdelu2zy3862rf2et50c3kvp29nqk59klfts363hktqvlfr7p I'm not a religious person, but people used to identify with religion before Nationalism was a thing. Under my point of view, a ridiculous ideology who destroyed human civilization overall. The belief of the Ubermensch.
This is very easy to see on Germany. Despite having same language, history and racial attributes, they didn't feel equal between Northern and Southern Germans.
Northern Germans would assimilate more with Sweden than Southern Germans. Also Southern Germans assimilated with Italians, Ungars, Romanian or Slovaks instead of Northern Germans.
Ban the stoves :honk:
nostr:npub1hye323nnrzdelu2zy3862rf2et50c3kvp29nqk59klfts363hktqvlfr7p My point is, with not enough legitimacy, your rule will die with you.
Franco knew that, he understood the Bourbons would provide enough legitimacy at Spain to keep the country united and prevent an internal split of their regions. Even if they do nothing but ceremonial things.
The whole role of a King is create unity among people who are culturally similar but do not identity as the same.
Example: Many countries from Austria-Hungary still honor the Habsburgs, and some of them still have an significant desire for a Monarchy alike, even the Slavic ones.
If you take Communists, their political leaders are nothing but puppets from the coucil, Stalin wanted to retire and couldn't until death.
Nazis are kinda similar, except no real council. The party leader is also who takes the final decision.
Fascists needed a King support to rule. Hitler did that as well before WW2 started. Mosley was a strong Monarchist, pretty sure Primo de Rivera at Spain.
nostr:npub1hye323nnrzdelu2zy3862rf2et50c3kvp29nqk59klfts363hktqvlfr7p Franco wasn't Fascist, but sorta.
In order to rule against Republicans he took the compromise from Falangists and Monarchists.
Franco did an excellent job to maintain both groups peacefully, understanding they hated each other as they have different ideals.
Falangists were similar to Fascism. Nationalism and Syndicalism, restricted borders, market regulations and a strong political figure. Monarchists wanted a legitimate king at rule, empowered church and much market regulations.
nostr:npub1hye323nnrzdelu2zy3862rf2et50c3kvp29nqk59klfts363hktqvlfr7p My point is, with not enough legitimacy, your rule will die with you.
Franco knew that, he understood the Bourbons would provide enough legitimacy at Spain to keep the country united and prevent an internal split of their regions. Even if they do nothing but ceremonial things.
The whole role of a King is create unity among people who are culturally similar but do not identity as the same.
Example: Many countries from Austria-Hungary still honor the Habsburgs, and some of them still have an significant desire for a Monarchy alike, even the Slavic ones.
If you take Communists, their political leaders are nothing but puppets from the coucil, Stalin wanted to retire and couldn't until death.
Nazis are kinda similar, except no real council. The party leader is also who takes the final decision.
Fascists needed a King support to rule. Hitler did that as well before WW2 started. Mosley was a strong Monarchist, pretty sure Primo de Rivera at Spain.
nostr:npub1hye323nnrzdelu2zy3862rf2et50c3kvp29nqk59klfts363hktqvlfr7p They are incompatible ideologies.
- Monarchism rule is based on aristocracy, legitimacy is made by legacy and tradition.
- Theocracy rule is based on religious leaders, legitimacy is made by faith.
- Fascism/Nazism and Communism are based on single-party rule of commoners, Legitimacy is made by vote or dictatorship, just like Democracy and overall Socialism.
