Avatar
teljkon
ebf67dbf1854bcba8b57a3c9b0f058eca175685dc7f63fe50f00efba0af5a2e1
Replying to Avatar Lyn Alden

I used to believe in political incrementalism- the idea that you can change things gradually through better election outcomes.

But maybe it was also just youth, I don’t know.

After spending many years studying how the current monetary system works, studying how past debt and currency cycles ended, and based on practical realities from the past two election cycles, I dropped any notion of incrementalism, at least for the big economic things.

Incrementalism works for minority groups to gain social and political rights. Religious people to practice without interference, women to vote, gay people to marry, etc. Immigration policies. Things like that. But it doesn’t work for the financial system.

Instead, history and current affairs suggest that things generally point in the same structural financial direction, uncontested, until there is a massive fiscal crisis, geopolitical crisis, and trend change. And that is when politics becomes critical in all aspects- as chaos develops, the group that has enough power to set the next order *really* fucking matters. They either build a platform of virtue toward the next cycle, or they fall into the unfortunately common paths of communism or fascism.

And it is not just ideas that triumph, but technology too. Technology plays a big role in which ideas are even workable. Both ideas and technology are important.

So when I realized incrementalism wasn’t working, I sought out other methods.

The weaker method is just social- I try to put things out there with my platform to encourage reason, empathy, human rights, etc. Not partisan but also not necessarily moderate, but rather grounded in firm principles of virtue ethics.

The stronger method is to play some small part in building something better. Alternative money. Alternative communication methods. Either explaining and recommending them to people, or directly venture investing in companies that build on them and help improve the UX and solve new problems.

That’s my goal. I want to do whatever tiny part I can to bring about more peace, more fairness, more opportunity, more growth, and less destruction.

No doubt the current order always policies out incrementalism. The effect is that it takes major action to effect any change. The problem is to avoid overswing in the other direction.

Will this work

This doesn't seem like your a fan of BTC? Shit wonder why? Fake azz fuckers.

Libertarians are naturally inclined to not change much from natural law its true. However libertarianism is to broad to say all people who identify as such believe this.

For example I'm a minarchist. And property ownership systems work fine. IMHO.

The little bird violat and seduta sulado are my favorites. The seduta is a perfect collision of the abstract nature of your earlier work and the photo realism of your perfected works. I am of course assuming progression by form but perhaps you can correct me.

As a guess your a few thousand hours away from mastery. If photo esq realism is your goal.

A few give that surreal feeling that you could just crawl into them like your crawling threw a window.

Splendid

Is that bible vers what copy. I've read the king James but am unfamiliar with other versions.

I also don't think my country should fund either side.

Why the ostrich. I missed something.

We have them on the strings for a round. Don't be so sure it's over.