nostr:npub1zsmqwsekvkxtykld4hty6wf37608m60vt2lxrt0kktgrqsk5m6yswfwvua It might be - I honestly don't know how I'd distinguish things based on that definition though.
nostr:npub198t8kgwqas59rvmnghzcdn6krzhxhpkyt2mt53e4g9sdnj74sszss5hasj OK, try a different one. In the bash case, someone sits down and writes code to perform a task. In the AI case, it's a training - there's no definition, the training process has inferred the mapping.
nostr:npub198t8kgwqas59rvmnghzcdn6krzhxhpkyt2mt53e4g9sdnj74sszss5hasj But you have no complete definition of the tests in the AI case; the fact you don't know the relationship between pixel input and 'it's a person' is why it's inferred isn't it?
The Mac Plus had modern multi monitor support in 1986: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=slY_F1MxGlk #VintageApple #VintageMac #RetroComputing
nostr:npub1vr4dqq5vzpz0kaavv3lc3098jmfzrpdtj79dazpemytqw4ansf0q2d92wq Seeing Mac 2's do it in ~89 was still damn impressive - having windows split across monitors of different colour depth and resolution is still magic today.