Dismissing climate change threats by citing human "adaptability" through technology,
That is ignoring its impact on animals and vulnerable people like the un-housed.
While climate change may not be an existential threat to First World countries, I dread witnessing the future suffering it will cause
https://edition.cnn.com/2024/05/21/climate/dead-monkeys-mexico-trees-heat-climate-intl/index.html
#globalwarming #news #climatechange #cnn
I dismiss climate change by calling it a complete lie. And as evidence I submit all the climate disaster predictions that didn't happen, and all the worlds richest people buying beachfront property. What evidence is there to support that it's real?
For no more war I would buy several of those Bibles.
How far is your horizon? A day, a week, a year? Ten years?
I can only say with confidence that it will be worth increasingly greater quantities of fiat papers over the long term.
Year 3000, 1 sat = 1 sat, and nobody has cared for hundreds of years.
Wars, imposed scarcity, and usury has ended. Taxation is voluntary and governments serve the needs of people efficiently. There is an abundance of food, nearly all products are downloaded and printed instead of purchased from business. Mankind has enjoyed 500 years of peace and prosperity, thanks to the disappearance of evil warmongering mega-thieves.
Pretty bold prediction. Let's see what happens.
I'm not the OP but I think 20-30 years. Sooner if the dollar accelerates inflation. Later if things are uncommonly stable.
😅🤣
https://video.nostr.build/61ef211e5522479de9bf971a1ebc0cc2317ff55e87d99c79a60cc790a442e169.mp4
#Bitcoin #Nostr #Memes
Lol, give it a little time, have faith. Everybody wins in the long run.
And the knowledge that this will happen is more valuable than money.
Just checked BTC/ETH price. Looks like BTC is more valuable against ETH now than it ever has been. (Right now 1BTC = ~22 ETH)
I think we're seeing a big consolidation among investors who see this tech for what it is.
#Bitcoin is a #revolution. #Ethereum is #fiat.
A lot of bitcoiners who think that spam helps (bad) mining pools/miners to get more fees but free market is screaming at us and showing that spam doesn't help with fees.
In fact, almost all of the block space is being filled with a lot of garbage and mining pools'/miners' main source of income is still block subsidy (aka 3.125 bitcoin/block mined). Moreover, it's increasing the cost of running your own full node.
Do not forget that spammers are exploiting legitimate bug in the #bitcoin script to add garbage data and rationalizing it with "it helps miners/mining pools" or "They are valid transactions".
As nostr:npub16s0grk7sp9255t0s22suc5rhamhsf325hn8dcxzjdz2gw0rcms7stj8ky6 said before, "The economic impact inscriptions have on fees is completely irrelevant to whether they are a bug or not. If there were zero inscriptions ever and the bug was never exploited and never impacted fees, it would still be an unpatched bug that should be addressed. My attitude towards inscriptions won't change with the weather of fees. If mempool cleared and blocks weren't full, I'd still say inscriptions are a bug that need to be patched.
There are many bugs in bitcoin which have zero economic impact on the network, because they just aren't that kind of bug. Even if a bug has no economic impact, its still a bug. You should not be thinking about bitcoin in terms of "at X sat/vb its a bug, but at Y sat/vb its not."
Sounds a bit like saying trucks are driving up the price of gasoline. It might be true but I'm not going to cease driving a truck. If people want to pay more to put their garbage data on the blockchain then let them.
Same thing we do every night Pinky. Keep on hodling forever.