ef
nobody
efb8614ca2ab15152fffa65317a2ff8aa556a9cc9b312d774813042b7f8f11d7
account deleted

Makes perfect sense why no one has tried. nostr:note1kxhcazcarqaxv24x8jr4rt75z4jl0m5rj4t6l800g7vjxqp8tuqsejvtrp

Global banks are part of the liquidity 'confidence game'. Productive companies generating free cash flows are much more likely to represent a traditional capital allocators perspective. Trust accordingly.

This would actually be a bit of fun 🤝🍻 nostr:note1ys5kvn37gkm5cgpp3lqglq6dgwkx3506gl52cp90hnvughryx4wszc3rmw

If you were wondering who had a role in it - here is Branson confirming MI6 and CIA either directly, indirectly or simply are using the outcome to twist and advance their narrative on Russia. If you legit fall for the 'Russia is an existential threat' narrative then you cannot be saved.

I hope one day our boys are good mates. nostr:note120kkmywh4ze9xkrgyscnva06cmrg66qfnpfmdtzs6ccj29cdv62shz8fnj

Replying to Avatar Erik Cason

nostr:npub1cqm6dztalp4l6n04f9k20c333xftgangjla337736dr6faz9na0qf2hjec we gonna do one while we are in Maderia? nostr:note16me3nww6zhv03u8v2xct8j9v25z0mt3dqkdcs84c395s5y83cyvqdwtjf9

Hell yes please gents!

What is deemed appropriate UTXO sizing? Anything over X sats? Confused on this!

Waiting on legacy banks to reopen on Monday to process transactions is some amateur hour finance bullshit.

Can't believe we ever put up with this.

I shouldn't have too - you are the author of this fiction novel. The suspense is killing me!

I don't see an obvious reason for Putin here. He had effectively neutralised the threat domestically.

What makes more sense here is that the CIA wanted to escalate the 'Putin Dictator' narrative to sure up financial aid for Ukraine.

Likely in response to a rational interview conducted with Tucker. nostr:note193nhgs87943sjytz5re4qchuh32rj33uystwftuwavhlkt9ms8vs0ekqj2

Registration leads to confiscation.

Repeat it.

DO NOT invest in a mining company if they cannot articulate to you what their migration plan is and/or their contingency mode of operation.

This is actually a very typical and classic JP Morgan playbook strategy.

1. Talk it down hard while to scramble to evaluate the investment thesis.

2. Attempt to destroy it if you can (cheapest option to retain existing oligopoly position).

3. Accepting it can't be destroyed then continue to talk it down while you engineer your entry point.

4. Acquire as much as you can while you maintain and stoke fear in retail.

5. Once a sufficiently sized position is taken then use that to lobby and manipulate regulators into thinking you broadly represent the market players.

6. Convince govts that they should buy but only after a hard fork that better establishes OFAC rulesets and supply 'elasticity'.

Ultimately it is clear their strategy is to attempt to destroy it from within.

It can't work but it can create another mess circa 2017. nostr:note13hankrdjgkhzptj6u724zmmvhhv7mc7qwgxp8y69h9y8vryk7yqq6rwxzs

Is that correct? 3.7 million lost? Wow I had no idea it was so much down the dunny.