Avatar
satsminded
f0029dde157c530b57fb88549236034a67cdd08eefce516e3fdcd4e9af90444a

Friendly reminder that seed oils offer no benefits to eaters, only to subsidy mining corps and Big Food.

They might both be wrong. Follow the physics.

Absolute truth= Newtonianism and earlier

Relativity = Einsteinism

______ ? = Quantum

We aren’t going back to absolute truth (I have it and you don’t) no matter how hard it’s pushed. What’s next? We’re figuring it out now. nostr:note1pwn9sf2krkhqmw96dfm6xuhdv456u7y579u2n5dj8j027tmdwlts873grp

But remember that the difference between poison and medicine is the dose nostr:note17sdz6wdzqkgumr62er2wf6d7p58w0urrz9dw60w937jfqrfjjwqsn9u2wg

Bodyboarding is fun too. Great start for learning waveriding…but can progress to elite and critical level as well. Something to consider.

Replying to Avatar jimmysong

Why Joe Rogan Avoids Bitcoin Discussions

Joe Rogan has sidestepped Bitcoin discussions for the past seven years, despite previously hosting Andreas Antonopoulous multiple times. What's stopping him from inviting more Bitcoin enthusiasts?

At the heart of it, Rogan simply may not be interested. Delving into Bitcoin discussions means wading into the relentless debates between Bitcoin and altcoin supporters. Every podcaster who touches on Bitcoin faces the pressure of giving equal time to altcoin enthusiasts. This tug-of-war is daunting, and Rogan likely prefers to sidestep it. Consider the case of Lex Friedman, who has faced criticism from both sides for trying to strike a balance. It's why Rogan doesn't have anyone on to discuss abortion, for example. It's a controversial topic and anyone you have on will destroy your standing with the segment that disagrees with you.

Yet Rogan is an outspoken critic of fiat money, frequently discussing its flaws and potential for corruption. He acknowledges the problems with central bank digital currencies and even mentions Bitcoin in these contexts. His audience likely wants him to have guests on about this topic, and this is why he had Antonopoulous on before 2017. But the Bitcoin narrative became more complex around 2017 with the rise of venture capitalists and altcoin advocacy, the so-called scambrian explosion. Rogan's ignoring of Bitcoin is the result of this shift. He has a knack for sensing underlying issues, which has undoubtedly contributed to his podcasting success.

Yet, Rogan's understanding of Bitcoin remains superficial. Until he fully grasps how it fixes the problems he sees, it's unlikely he'll feature a dedicated Bitcoin guest. While figures like Jack Dorsey and Adam Curry have tried to steer the conversation towards Bitcoin, Rogan refused to take the bait. It'll take a larger level of inflation or economic destruction for him to delve into this topic.

The controversy will remain on Bitcoin versus altcoins and that's not something he'll be able to avoid. He needs more conviction before he'll talk about it on his show and that's not something he has yet.

So instead of trying to bully him into having a guest on, just point out the obvious. Fiat money is the cause of a lot of the societal degeneration. Whether he gets it sooner or later will be up to him.

Good posts Jimmy

It’s real gum as we know it, but unflavored. Cheap and tough

I literally just use lard as complete moisturizer- hands feet arms legs face. It’s unsurpassed.

Just clicked the X logo thinking it was to close out the window…but it took me to home page of course 😆

Not a great logo huh?

Social media, for better or worse, has many of us assuming that communication is simply information transmission.

My phone packages information and sends it over a channel to a receiver, that’s you. Or in the context of social media: Write a post, and hit send.

It’s easy to assume that “our position” or “our message” is most important.

This is the transmission model of communication, and it’s what technology does.

But that’s just the technical process of moving info to another, and it’s not the best way to approach human communication.

The rhetorical model of communication is a more useful way to define communication.

Rather than merely transmitting information, Good communicators constantly focus on the effects they have, adapting their communication to have the effects they’re intending.

As good communicators, we should be less concerned with the content of our message, and more focused on the effect it’s having.

Good communicators are other centered people.

I resonate with everything you write here. The decentralized nature and ebb and flow of in and out of groups is true and an interesting parallel. I’ve only really trained in one school- so hasn’t been my personal experience yet- but I’m open to it if I find another mestre.

About the money thing- so true . It’s also a Brazilian thing I believe. As an American, I’ve only tried to be generous with my mestre and others when possible.

A lot of mestres live around the world and are sending money to BR regularly. I agree that doing it with bitcoin is more malandro and even kinda manjinguero, as they are exploiting with courage and necessity their cyber (street) know how to make their way in a world that’s so often stacked against them.

Like saylor talks about cyberspace being the next frontier, the symbolism of capoeiristas using bitcoin seems like something potent. Can’t quite put my finger on it.