I may have stumbled upon something that cracks this coffee conundrum wide open.

As I have previously mentioned the fermentation process of plants makes them edible for humans because the fermentation process “pre-digests” the components of the food (starches, sugars, **plant toxins**, maybe some other stuff) making the the plants more easily digestible for humans.

This is the mechanism that makes sourdough bread less glutenous than regular bread. The sourdough culture is eating the gluten.

As I was sipping on some kombucha (fermented tea) this morning I was thinking about how there’s less caffeine and less sugar in it because of this fermentation process. (Caffeine is a natural-occurring insecticide that is eaten up by the fermentation process)

Then I thought, “I wonder if there’s fermented coffee?”

Lo-and-behold, fermented coffee is a thing and it contains 90% less caffeine than a regular cup of coffee making it more easily digestible. Because of this it removes a lot of the bitterness from the flavor as well making the taste more pleasant when consumed black.

That said, I liken coffee to one of those bullshit green smoothies, where it’s just a highly potent plant-toxin juice that you couldn’t possibly get a similar dosage from by simply eating the actual vegetable - or coffee beans in this case (Yes, one of the earliest ways coffee was consumed was chewing the beans with animal fat. I think it was the Mesai? or some other African tribe).

That said, I imagine that the probiotics are damaged in the actual brewing of the coffee, but the caffeine content is reduced which still makes it more easily digestible and not so bitter.

Maybe if you cold brew the beans you can maintain the probiotic benefits? I don’t know I literally just thought of this and spent like 30 minutes looking into it.

Be well, my friends!

*Scurries off into the night*

This is a deeply nerdy question but does anyone besides me think that the European Union's competition laws (antitrust for those of us in the United States) have been better for consumers and thus the world?

(Note: It's possible hyperbitcoinization obviates the need for competition laws. But in the current fiat world, I think they are needed.)

Opened Nostr in hopes to see some edgy content.

Extremely disappointed.

Pointing out someone's bias is not an argument

I'm considering going to bitcoin Atlantis.

The travel time is my primary reservation at this point. Anyone else going?

What in the actual fuck.

I am making a short video for Countelegraph about a surf shop in Ghana that accepts bitcoin as they’re a client of mine now.

cointelegraph are removing the fact that I wrote about paying “in lightning” coz they suspect I’m paid by the lightning network devs.

I found out from a confidant friend at Cointelegraph.

Im dying.

Yo lightning network devs, please could you pay me like they think I am?!!

Maybe I could talk to the CEO of the lightning network?

Phone being compromised is extremely unlikely. But sure we can always consider this an edge risk even with reputable mobile wallets

Bitcoin held on keys generated by Trezor

Bitcoin held on keys generated by Blockstream Green

Which is the bigger security concern?

#Plebchain

#AskNostr

why are we hate watching the davos thing? guys just ignore them, that's how they win lmao

This is the English translation of Prince Philip of Serbia and Yugoslavia's statement about his views on the benefits of a monarchy structure of governance. Published on December 26th 2023.

"In light of recent events and social unrest, I wish to share my perspective not as a critic but as an advocate for a governance model that I truly believe in — monarchy. As someone who embraces this ideal, the concept of a republic, to me, appears inefficient. I refrain from endorsing any political faction; my civic participation, such as voting, is merely to inspire our citizens to exercise their rights. My ballot is personal, potentially even blank, symbolising my stance that the real answer lies not within party lines but in the structure of our governance itself.

Why monarchy? The reasoning is multi-faceted:

1.⁠ ⁠Long-Term Planning: Monarchs, as hereditary rulers, focus on the long-term health and wealth of the nation, thinking ahead for future generations.

2. Property Rights: Monarchs, as owners of their realms, have a strong incentive to uphold property rights, essential for economic stability.

3. ⁠Lower Time Preference: Monarchies prioritise long-term prosperity over short-term gains, leading to more sustainable economic policies.

4. Stability and Continuity: The clear and predictable succession in monarchies offers a stable form of governance, beneficial for economic and foreign policy planning.

5. Reduced Rent-Seeking: Monarchies have fewer opportunities for rent-seeking compared to democracies, where special interest groups can influence policy.

6. Protection Against Majority Tyranny: Monarchies are less prone to the tyranny of the majority, as the monarch’s legitimacy isn’t dependent on majority opinion.

7. Election Cycle-Driven Short-Termism: Politicians in democracies, constrained by the need to win elections, prioritise immediate, popular measures that win votes over long-term, sustainable policies.

8. ⁠Incentive for Personal Gain: The relatively short tenure of democratic leaders create an incentive to accumulate wealth and benefits quickly, at the expense of long-term national interests.

9. ⁠Policy Inconsistency: Frequent changes in leadership lead to inconsistent policies, disrupting long-term planning and economic stability.

10. ⁠Impact of Special Interests: Politicians in democracies are more susceptible to influence by special interest groups, tailoring policies for immediate benefits rather than the overall good.

11. Absolute Accountability: In democracies, accountability can be diluted as leaders involved in scandals can be replaced, and political parties may offer different platforms but act similarly once in power. A monarchy, however, stands as the singular entity fully accountable for the nation’s political success and failures. Thus, when significant events unfold, the responsibility resides solely with the monarchy, ensuring that the blame is not diffused or passed onto others.

As a supporter of hard money principles, I am committed to the economic stability and freedom of Serbia. My dedication extends beyond current politics; it is about fostering a deep, lasting connection to our homeland for my children and their progeny. My work and my legacy are for the long-term prosperity and liberty of our nation."

mene.com