Avatar
Theophilus
f1f407624b99cd0b56c95a4c645179bdba1a5c2b1d7a4c4f82218cefcbba6857
Christian Bitcoiner

Psalm 139:23

[23] Search me, O God, and know my heart!

Try me and know my thoughts!

GM, Happy Reformation Day!

The rock on which the Church is built is Christ the cornerstone. He is a stone of stumbling and rock of offense for those who reject him, but is the rock of salvation for those who believe.

Jesus, the rock of ages, cleft for you. Trust him.

Prayer for today:

ā€œSlay utterly, O Lord, and cast down the sin which does so easily beset us; bridle the unholy affection; stay the unlawful thought; chasten the temper, regulate the spirit; correct the tongue; bend the will and the worship of our souls to you and so sanctify and subdue the whole inward man, that setting up your throne in our hearts, to the dethronement of all our idols, and the things of earth we hold too dear, you may reign there alone in the fullness of your grace, and the consolations of your presence, till the time arrives when we shall reign with you in glory. Amen.ā€

- Richard Brooke

O worship the King all-glorious above,

O gratefully sing his power and his love:

our shield and defender, the Ancient of Days,

pavilioned in splendor and girded with praise.

Replying to Avatar Dikaios1517

Dispensationalism, that's why.

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzp3l2mncdqdv476qsq0gq2vnxw2w4fzpygns838vq65umdpuzretzqyg8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnddakj7qgwwaehxw309ahx7uewd3hkctcqyz2d7sgk9lqma4yv5e6540fuep4mrs8620rfgket2uv4kee2v57yk0e39pu

Dispensationalism is a way of interpreting the Bible that sees (among other things) the promises God made to Abraham in Genesis 12, 15, and 17 as properly belonging only to the Jews as an ethnic people, and therefore they are seen as God's true covenant people, while the New Testament Church is seen as an historical parenthesis. God will therefore eventually take up fulfilling his promises to his true covenant people, the Jews, once he is finished with his plan for the Church.

This teaching is directly contradictory to the teaching of the Apostles, who expressly applied the promises made to Abraham to the New Testament Church. See Acts 2:39 as a repetition of God's promise in Genesis 17:7-8, but expanded to include "all who are far off," that is Gentiles who would come to faith in the Messiah. Likewise, Paul tells the church in Rome that they are children of Abraham by sharing in the same faith that Abraham had in Romans 4, especially verses 9-17.

Paul repeats this teaching even more explicitly in Galatians 3:5-9, where he says:

> "Does he who supplies the Spirit to you and works miracles among you do so by works of the law, or by hearing with faith--just as Abraham "believed God, and it was counted to him as righteousness"? Know then that it is those of faith who are the sons of Abraham. And the Scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the Gentiles by faith, preached the gospel beforehand to Abraham, saying, "In you shall all the nations be blessed." So then, those who are of faith are blessed along with Abraham, the man of faith."

The final nail in the coffin of the Dispensationalist's improper hermeneutic, in my opinion, is found in Romans 9, though. There Paul describes the nature of the relation of the Gentiles who are coming to faith in Jesus to those Jews who apostatize by rejecting him. The description is that of an olive tree, where the natural branches that reject Christ are cut off, while the wild branches (Gentiles) are grafted in. Into what? Into "Israel," as he calls it in verse 26. Gentiles who come to faith are grafted into Israel, God's covenant people, and Jews who reject Jesus are cut off. They no longer have any claim on the promises made to Abraham and no right to call themselves God's people whatsoever. In order to regain that claim, they must come to faith in the promised messiah, Jesus Christ.

Indeed. Christ is the true Israel, and the church, made up of Jews and Gentiles, are united to Christ, through whom God’s covenant promises are fulfilled. It’s a categorical error to equate biblical Israel to the modern state of Israel.

Every church we drove by on our way to church on Sunday had noticeably more cars in their parking lots.

We had new visitors, too.

Praise God.

True freedom is the liberty to choose the good. Big difference from freedom as the liberty to do whatever you want.

For those curious, CS Lewis in Mere Christianity. Highly recommended reading.

Lord, without you I can do nothing; with you I can do all. Help me by your grace, that I fall not; help me by your strength, to resist mightily the very first beginnings of evil, before it takes hold of me; help me to cast myself at once at your sacred feet, and lie still there, until storm be overpast; and, if I lose sight of you, bring me back quickly to you, and grant me to love you better. Amen.

– E.B. Pusey

GM. May the Lord keep you this day.

CS Lewis on Marriage:

The idea that ā€˜being in love’ is the only reason for remaining married really leaves no room for marriage as a contract or a promise at all. […]

As Chesterton pointed out, those who are in love have a natural inclination to bind themselves by promises. […] And of course, the promise, made when I’m in love and because I’m in love, to be true to the beloved as long as I live, commits me to being true even if I cease to be in love.

[…]

Being in love is a good thing, but it is not the best thing. There are many things below it, but there are also things above it. You cannot make it the basis of a whole life. It is a noble feeling, but it is still a feeling.

Now no feeling can be relied on to last in its full intensity, or even to last at all. Knowledge can last, principles can last, habits can last; but feelings come and go. And in fact, whatever people say, the state called ā€˜being in love’ usually does not last.

If the old fairy-tale ending ā€˜They lived happily ever after' is taken to mean ā€˜They felt for the next fifty years exactly as they felt the day before they were married’, then it says what probably never was nor ever would be true, and would be highly undesirable if it were. Who could bear to live in that excitement for even five years? What would become of your work, your appetite, your sleep, your friend-ships?

But, of course, ceasing to be 'in love' need not mean ceasing to love. Love in this second sense—love as distinct from 'being in love'—is not merely a feeling. It is a deep unity, maintained by the will and deliberately strengthened by habit; reinforced by (in Christian marriages) the grace which both partners ask, and receive, from God.

They can have this love for each other even at those moments when they do not like each other; as you love yourself even when you do not like yourself. They can retain this love even when each would easily, if they allowed themselves, be ā€˜in love' with someone else. 'Being in love' first moved them to promise fidelity: this quieter love enables them to keep the promise. It is on this love that the engine of marriage is run: being in love was the explosion that started it.

[…]

People get from books the idea that if you have married the right person you may expect to go on 'being in love’ for ever.

As a result, when they find they are not, they think this proves they have made a mistake and are entitled to a change—not realising that, when they have changed, the glamour will presently go out of the new love just as it went out of the old one. In this department of life, as in every other, thrills come at the beginning and do not last. The sort of thrill a boy has at the first idea of flying will not go on when he has joined the R.A.F. and is really learning to fly. The thrill you feel on first seeing some delightful place dies away when you really go to live there.

Does this mean it would be better not to learn to fly and not to live in the beautiful place? By no means. In both cases, if you go through with it, the dying away of the first thrill will be compensated for by a quieter and more lasting kind of interest.

What is more (and I can hardly find words to tell you how important I think this), it is just the people who are ready to submit to the loss of the thrill and settle down to the sober interest, who are then most likely to meet new thrills in some quite different direction. The man who has learned to fly and become a good pilot will suddenly discover music; the man who has settled down to live in the beauty spot will discover gardening.

This is, I think, one little part of what Christ meant by saying that a thing will not really live unless it first dies.

It is simply no good trying to keep any thrill: that is the very worst thing you can do. Let the thrill go—let it die away—go on through that period of death into the quieter interest and happiness that follow—and you will find you are living in a world of new thrills all the time. But if you decide to make thrills your regular diet and try to prolong them artificially, they will get weaker and weaker, and fewer and fewer, and you will be a bored, disillusioned old man for the rest of your life.

It is because so few people understand this that you find many middle-aged men and women maundering about their lost youth, at the very age when new horizons ought to be appearing and new doors opening all round them. It is much better fun to learn to swim than to go on endlessly (and hopelessly) trying to get back the feeling you had when you first went paddling as a small boy.

ā€œGod takes you from where you are, and not from where you should have been.ā€

GM nostr:nprofile1qqsp4lsvwn3aw7zwh2f6tcl6249xa6cpj2x3yuu6azaysvncdqywxmgpz4mhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejqz9rhwden5te0wfjkccte9ejxzmt4wvhxjmcd7ctyt , you were created by God in his image for his glory. There are no little people. Check out Francis Schaeffer’s book by the same title. https://www.crossway.org/books/no-little-people-tpb-2/

nostr:nprofile1qqs8msutuusu385l6wpdzf2473d2zlh750yfayfseqwryr6mfazqvmgpr9mhxue69uhhqun9d45h2mfwwpexjmtpdshxuet59uqjzamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3dwfjkccte9e6x27rpwd5x2er8v5h8s7t69ue8f9pt is document upload down? Images upload fine but not documents regardless of file type. ā€œFailed to process document. Please try again.ā€

Friends, consider supporting this project by nostr:npub1g3ra9r7duxrh8q0l2l08ku73ptdfgr0z376mvc2earlfhm6s6xxss8lnnz

https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/tgfb/the-orange-umbrella-book

Bitcoin and sin. We need new hearts.

https://youtu.be/6t8fGZNEQ_o