Avatar
Alan Siefert
f26606e331f128325ec99cd38782edbec134a5f911ea9fada7adce2ca9015b16

Still better than ClosedAI because at least we get an open model. They will probably receive the TikTok treatment in the US eventually.

KYC is the illicit activity.

nostr:note1hllda7sfhc66209nfdg3ymtx4v86cxdp9j232k68dlhrj9mmm6nsgk0lre

Gonna have to top up the zapping wallet again soon!

Probably something similar to the frontier models in the US, which are marginally better than Deepseek R1. I’d be surprised if they had something way better, but it’s possible I suppose.

The path US companies are taking in AI development is an embarrassing, annoying pain - closed-source, secretive development and a walled garden approach for the users. Everyone having to go through an expensive API with no use case flexibility or visibility into its workings. Hope they crash and burn TBH.

The last hope for the US to capture AI is the EUV lithography bottleneck, ASML being the *one* global supplier as of now, but this hope is rapidly fleeting as well.

https://www.ccn.com/news/harbin-researchers-sidestep-us-snactions/

Replying to Avatar L0la L33tz

Another day, another exchange I am suspended from.

All of my funds are conjoined or swapped between LN/XMR for privacy before sending to exchanges, triggering all sorts of nonsense AML flags.

The exchange I am with now is requesting proof of funds, meaning it wants to see fiat coming into my bank account from an entity I have a business relationship with, asking me to "kindly assist them" in surveilling me.

Except that all of my business relationships are handled in bitcoin – meaning that it is impossible for me to show proof of fiat funds.

Alternatively, the exchange says, I could send them “the address” to which I received payment in the last year, matching the amount of money I have exchanged on their platform.

Obviously no such address exists as I create a new address for each transaction (and so should you). Additionally, much of my money comes in through donations, for which I simply do not have an invoice.

I could now send them every single zap I ever received on nostr in the past year – for context, that would be over 250 zaps in the past week alone, s/o to all the zappers – or I could move my business to Switzerland, where I can exchange up to 1000 CHF per day KYC-free (for now), which is what I’m going to do.

However, since I’ll be more heavily relying on peer-to-peer exchanges from now on, I’ll likely have my bank account flagged for receiving weekly payments from randos on the internet, making it fairly foreseeable that I’ll be losing my bank account in the coming months as well.

Fundamental rights violations aside, the amount of complete nonsense work – and with that costs – this system creates both for the Government and private institutions is absolutely astonishing. If there ever was a true bullshit job, compliance officer would no doubt be it.

It’s time we end the global discrimination complex inherent to the financial system in which we are all guilty until proven innocent, only to upkeep an inefficient system that is useless in preventing crime but formidable for imposing mass surveillance on the people.

So no, I will not "kindly assist you" in surveilling me, and if I die on this hill.

Until then, shill me your favorite tools to pay my bills in bitcoin 👇

They’re trying to close the gates.

Would be nice but I’m doubtful. I think this is a short-term dip in the valuation of AI hardware companies. The hardware will still be widely used whether it’s by data centers or consumers. Hopefully consumer AI hardware gets some more love now though.

Pretty much!

nostr:note1ux5nyvmhrn0fswtjrpeh65fdagz3r6kc3l6utkn8vdevcnm6v34qkzy0cw

Of course consumer hardware is advancing too. Supposedly with a couple of Nvidia’s upcoming Digits computers connected together you’ll be able to run a 400B parameter model locally.

That’s what the big players like (Closed)OpenAI are going to bet on - adopt these efficiencies as they pop up and keep scaling, hoping that their capabilities will only be matched by similar scale as efficiency improvements run out.

I keep thinking there might be a point when the efficiency gains that let the smaller models keep up with the big ones run out (as the big players adopt these too), then the only way to match capability will be to have nearly the same 2 Trillion or whatever parameter size. Hope open source keeps up! 🙏

The message AI companies in the US *should* be getting is to embrace open source. Unfortunately the response we’re going to see is more lobbying to sanction China harder and block Chinese AI models in the US.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/markets/2025/01/27/china-deepseek-ai-stocks-impact/77966585007/

Whoever open sources the AI is who I’m rooting for. IDK if that’s shortsighted on nationalistic grounds.

Never mind, got that backwards. Heavy coinjoin use would move it the other way.

Hypothetically, would a huge jump in coinjoin usage result in a similar pattern?