Earn Bitcoin Daily with Me
Referral Code: MNGRZJII5A6
https://emberfund.onelink.me/ljTI/g5epzm7y?mining_referrer_id=MNGRZJII5A6
Yes Iβm shilling, why? bc 12 sats per hour per fren for clicking a button every day on an app is another way we stack sats
Im pretty sure most here already have an account but for the ones that donβt you should consider it, itβs freedom money at the click of a button.
What's the difference between that and earning fiat and then converting to sats?
inverse association with T2D incidence when substituting red meat with whole grains/cereals [0.90 (0.84, 0.96), n = 6] and ... replacing poultry with whole grains [0.87 (0.83, 0.90), n = 2] and eggs with nuts or whole grains [0.82 (0.79, 0.86), n = 2 or 0.79 (0.76, 0.83), n = 2]
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37968628/
Results: In total, 37 publications based on 24 cohorts were included. There was moderate CoE for a lower risk of CVD when substituting processed meat with nuts [SHR (95% CI): 0.73 (0.59, 0.91), n = 8 cohorts], legumes [0.77 (0.68, 0.87), n = 8], and whole grains [0.64 (0.54, 0.75), n = 7], as well as eggs with nuts [0.83 (0.78, 0.89), n = 8] and butter with olive oil [0.96 (0.95, 0.98), n = 3]. Furthermore, we found moderate CoE for an inverse association with T2D incidence when substituting red meat with whole grains/cereals [0.90 (0.84, 0.96), n = 6] and red meat or processed meat with nuts [0.92 (0.90, 0.94), n = 6 or 0.78 (0.69, 0.88), n = 6], as well as for replacing poultry with whole grains [0.87 (0.83, 0.90), n = 2] and eggs with nuts or whole grains [0.82 (0.79, 0.86), n = 2 or 0.79 (0.76, 0.83), n = 2]. Moreover, replacing red meat for nuts [0.93 (0.91, 0.95), n = 9] and whole grains [0.96 (0.95, 0.98), n = 3], processed meat with nuts [0.79 (0.71, 0.88), n = 9] and legumes [0.91 (0.85, 0.98), n = 9], dairy with nuts [0.94 (0.91, 0.97), n = 3], and eggs with nuts [0.85 (0.82, 0.89), n = 8] and legumes [0.90 (0.89, 0.91), n = 7] was associated with a reduced risk of all-cause mortality.
Tell us more what you do for trading. You buy options? Calls only or puts too? Do you follow specific stocks?
Yup. I don't think there is enough financial incentives to attract enough builders. That's a problem.
Why does it need to be on the Bitcoin network?
The ETH short didn't work out. Closing it with a loss.
Swapping all fiat into #bitcoin, and going long. (I only trade perps with a portion of my stack.) Rocket to Mars! #trading
#askNostr What are the financial incentives for the different nostr stakeholders, like relay operators and client devs?
Over the decades, a lot of incredible devs have created some amazing FOSS software. But working out the goodness of your heart is not sustainable. A good project is good for humanity. A great project is both good for humanity AND it's financially sustainable, because such a project will grow and improve and attract smart people.
With bitcoin, all the different stakeholders have a financial incentive, and they all feed off of each other.
With nostr, what are the incentives for the different stakeholders, such as relay operators and client devs?
Some relays charge a tiny fee, but you get the same nostr with free relays. Some clients charge a tiny fee for premium features. You need a ton of users for that to become sustainable. And, because it's nostr, users are not locked in, they can leave any time.
I'm short ETH/USD. π
I am becoming an "opinionated event kind" maxi. Nostr kinds could be designed for specific user experiences instead of general types. Like the picture kind Olas uses. Right now it accepts multiple image sizes but we could have one kind that only takes squared images for those clients to use.
It's similar to nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7erfw36x7tnsw43z7un9d3shjqpqdergggklka99wwrs92yz8wdjs952h2ux2ha2ed598ngwu9w7a6fsr4ma0r 's pitch of kind 1s with a 240 chars limit. We could copy kind 1 into a new kind whose expectation is to render only the first 240 chars of content and ignore all the rest. We could have Nostr clients that only render (and make the best UI for) those events.
With a tiny user base, I think you want clients to be able to use as many events as possible.
#Ethereum / #BitcoinAlts have no bottom. As for ethereum specifically, I just shorted it. Lol. There is no support at .03. it's going to fall through.
nostr:note1qqtg274dqzg6muk5dx57kllpcnh0c74k86lk43fr6n6mjfgfrpmqh0pecg
Why not just use bibtex. Optionally add bibtex to events. There are libraries to render bibtex in any citation format. Include a url field in the bibtex, and set it to nostr://whatever
Why not just use bibtex. Optionally add bibtex to events. There are libraries too render bibtex in any citation format. Include a url field in the bibtex, and set it to nostr://whatever
Does nostr even have functionality to "not like" something? Like a thumbs down?
Bitcoin is too directionless rn, but I want to stay in it for when it goes up. I think #Ethereum drops either way - if BTC starts pumping, people sell ETH to buy BTC.
Staying mostly in bitcoin. Swapping some of it into USD and using that to short ETH.
#bitcoin #trading
You only need to formalize the URI. Something like nostr://blah, instead of http. Also see DOI, and their standard URI.