Avatar
a source familiar with the matter
f5b55f6b44b8997b2b6e8469a6a57f8d3f3b2ef27023543445c40ecec485ee64
<script src="https://pastebin.com/embed_js/TstHh0VL"></script>

Gold is flat vs oil

But how about vs food?

I've researched this for discussions of fiat inflation, and even good food (eg beef) is cheaper in gold than it used to be

How about vs consumer electronics?

Definitely much cheaper

I think "money supply" is not the appropriate deflator, because a money supply that expands (as Bitcoin & gold are both still doing) more slowly than the population & productivity grow will gain in purchasing power despite "inflation"

But yes, most stocks & bonds will underperform just owning real money

Boom! headshot

I'd have gone Tribe or Tripe, then maybe I'd get Prune 3rd

Replying to Avatar Marakesh 𓅦

Eagles are a common symbol, yes

Relations of Man

***Man to Self***

A) Value your own life

Man like all animals tends toward vitality

As man increases in vitality, he expands from survival to health to reproduction

B) Never lie to yourself

Man is both mind and body

Mind may focus on memory or imagination, but body exists in present reality

Therefore, mind must embrace truths & discard error if man is to succeed

***Man to Man***

A) Seek trade, not predation

There are two relationships of man to man

1) Predator/Prey - one suffers at behest of the other

2) Mutalism - both benefit by the relationship, as in trade or family

And a third category, that of no relationship

Human prey and predator are the same species

Modern weapons annul the advantages of size and youth

Social action, whether dressed as justice or revenge, further suppresses the benefits of predation

Thus the predator must risk his vitality entire to extract even marginal benefits

Consequently it is a losing game, and more could be obtained in voluntary trade

Avoid becoming a predator by deception or voluntary furtherance of another's self-destruction, lest one's partner consider himself prey and make war

In the case of organized predation, a few benefit at the expense of the many

If instead the many benefit from the few, the few soon disappear

Wisdom dictates strategy of prey: disengagement (either flight or peaceful disobedience), war or obedience

The few require the support of the many, thus widespread peaceful disobedience ends the organized predation

***Man to Nature***

A) Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed

B) Men are part of Nature

Men are neither gods above Nature, nor spirits trapped within it, nor demons imposed upon it, nor refuse beneath it

Replying to Avatar Snotklap

Science has become a religion. Here is something I wrote not too long ago:

Traditional religion has been supplanted by a new belief system known as Scientism, where the government acts as the new church. This shift is not about the scientific method itself but rather about the faith placed in so-called experts. This prevailing belief system has become akin to the dominant religion of our time, with people so firmly believing in "the Science" that they fail to recognise it as a form of religion, instead accepting it as the absolute truth.

This faith in Scientism mirrors traditional religious belief in several ways. Both place an ultimate authority on truth and reality—science or a divine entity—and centre around a set of beliefs: Scientism in the infallibility of scientific methods and empirical evidence, and religious faith in the teachings and existence of a god or gods. Followers of Scientism, much like adherents of traditional religions, show devotion to their beliefs, which shapes their identity and community, providing a sense of belonging and a shared worldview.

A significant element of this new belief system is the reverence afforded to doctors, who are often viewed and trusted in a manner similar to priests in traditional religions. Just as priests are seen as intermediaries between the divine and the faithful, offering guidance, interpretation, and the administration of sacred rites, doctors within the church of Scientism are regarded as the mediators between "the Science" and the public. They interpret scientific findings, administer treatments (akin to sacraments), and guide individuals in making life choices based on the latest medical and scientific understanding. This trust in doctors underscores a profound faith in their knowledge and authority, positioning them as critical figures in the societal structure of Scientism.

Both the government, as the new church of Scientism, and traditional religious institutions employ remarkably similar methods of control and influence. They operate within structured hierarchies that demand respect and obedience. Legislation and dogma, education and indoctrination, the use of fear and rewards, and control over information are tools used by both to maintain power and uphold certain beliefs.

Moreover, ceremonies, rituals, symbols, and iconography reinforce loyalty and the values of these institutions, creating a strong sense of identity and belonging. The inclusion and exclusion criteria further define community boundaries, while both claim a form of moral authority that legitimises their rules and decisions.

Adding to this parallel, peer-reviewed studies have become synonymous with holy scriptures within the realm of Scientism. They are revered and quoted as the ultimate source of truth, guiding public policy and personal health decisions with an authority akin to that of sacred texts in religious traditions. Similarly, vaccinations can be seen as the Scientism counterpart to baptism in traditional religions, representing a rite of initiation and a symbolic induction into the community. These elements underscore the moral and communal dimensions of such practices within this belief system.

Crucially, questioning or criticising "the Science" that underpins Scientism elicits reactions reminiscent of those observed in traditional religious contexts. When the core tenets of Scientism are challenged, one can expect to encounter the same emotional outbursts that are typical of traditional religious disputes. This defensive stance highlights the role of authority in shaping collective beliefs and underscores how questioning the established "truth" becomes a fraught endeavour, often met with intense and emotional pushback. This dynamic not only reveals the emotional investment in Scientism but also the mechanisms by which it maintains its authority and cohesiveness, drawing a direct line to how traditional religions react to skepticism.

Thus, the resemblance between the control mechanisms of government as the church of Scientism and traditional religious churches is stark. It underscores how both types of institutions exert influence over individuals, often using a mix of psychological, social, and material means to achieve their ends. This expanded recognition prompts a reevaluation of our unwavering faith in "the Science" and invites us to question the similarities between traditional religious adherence and our contemporary belief systems, highlighting the complex interplay between belief, authority, and control in shaping human society.

Communism

Organized predation of the few by the many

In which the few either disengage (perhaps by flight) or are consumed, leading to expand "the few" to include new members and continue the predation. Eventually either reverts to ordinary statism (predation of the many by the few) or runs out of victims and collapses (or both).

“The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.”

-Margaret Thatcher

either is good

New York City didn't have a police department until the 1840s

Prior to that they relied on the English legal structure, namely ordinary crimes were mostly policed by armed private citizens. The main law enforcement officer was the sheriff, who was a servant of the courts. The governor could call in troops to quell a riot, but day-to-day life was largely free of law enforcement seeking out people to control them.

(Although there were some extremely statist periods during the Colonial Era as well)

IMO the great difficulty is coordinating revolt

the time to go was the 1930s when they shredded the Constitution (and thus killed the Republic)

now that USA is accustomed to unlawful government where do they draw the line?

our system is falling apart so we can't restrain ourselves to taking 100% of new productivity plus a further 2% of your wealth, we have to bump it up

Are you THE James Lindsay?

Or just a bot copying his Twitter.com posts?

In any case, it's cool to have you.

If it is you, I hope you'll devote more attention to the positive side of things (what is true and worth building/defending) as opposed to mainly exposing nonsense. I think the brief examination of American founding principles is incomplete without a justification for those principles.

You seem to be especially opposed to both national divorce as well as global government. How is it that USA is exactly the right size? Isn't that convenient? Would you tell an independent territory (say, BC breaks away from Canada) to join the Union?

Hatred of people of Jewish descent is stupid and pointless

Hatred of Orthodox Judaism is completely sound and rational

“A thousand non-Jewish lives are not worth a Jew’s fingernail”

Rabbi Dov Lior,

Chairman of the Jewish Rabbinical Council

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2004/5/20/rabbi-supports-killings-in-rafah

Bitcoin is a trillion times more scarce than gold.

I have yet to see even an ounce of Bitcoin.