As long as you are not banned on Telegram, you are not an OG
Money from bankrupt countries https://m.primal.net/IHdJ.mp4
i find this character rather annoying and unimaginative
The Satoshi Nakamoto Institute is dedicated to advancing and preserving hashtag#bitcoin knowledge. Our website should be a reflection of these goals. SNI is raising 21 million sats to bring our vision to life and redesign our website to align with the aesthetic principles of our new logo.
Our new logo was designed by the talented bitcoin designer, Skyler, who carefully crafted it to embody a sense of timelessness. Inspired by Renaissance printers' marks, it focuses on bitcoin's 21m supply cap in the context of a rich technological and intellectual tradition.
By embracing timeless aesthetic principles, we believe we can place bitcoin rightfully in these traditions and give the ideas the respect they deserve, honoring the past while educating and inspiring the future for generations to come.
We invite you to support our mission by contributing to our 21 million sats goal. Help us give SNI timeless beauty and create a website worthy of Bitcoin's revolutionary ideas by donating BTC (or USD) via Zaprite today: https://pay.zaprite.com/pl_saYgrVYmCi
Read the full announcement here: https://nakamotoinst.substack.com/p/help-give-sni-timeless-beauty
donated 🫡
The hacker interview is on nostr. Thanks to whomever uploaded it. https://media.nostr.build/p/7GDv2.mp3
You would think that you could already track down the hacker based on his statements... 🤔
Wikileaks should also disseminate the data sets via Nostr 🤔 ...
Saying blackrock, for example, “owns” their underlying Bitcoin ETF holdings is no different than saying Coinbase “owns” it since they actually hold custody.
They are required by law to hold the asset backing their ETF and so you could say it even “belongs” to the investors. All of these are ultimately incorrect.
Who really “owns” it is the US government as they could pass legislation to seize it at any moment. If they can change the constitution to legalize income tax, surrender their sole constitutional authority too coin currency to their banking donors and establish the Fed, issue an executive order to seize gold from private citizens, etc. then they can clearly pass legislation to seize the Bitcoin holdings in the event of a dollar collapse or “hyper-bitcoinization”.
In fact, it would be incredibly foolish of anyone to assume they wouldn’t.
you are always the optimistic part 😅
I hope the case can be taken to the next instance
Tether is a time bomb that will eventually cost a lot of people a lot of money. The shitcoin of shitcoins💩 . How often have states and companies claimed that their money was "covered" until it was "suddenly" uncovered? Someone once wrote something about it...:
"The root problem with conventional currency is all the trust that's required to make it work. The central bank must be trusted not to debase the currency, but the history of fiat currencies is full of breaches of that trust. Banks must be trusted to hold our money and transfer it electronically, but they lend it out in waves of credit bubbles with barely a fraction in reserve. We have to trust them with our privacy, trust them not to let identity thieves drain our accounts impossible." 🤔
Telegram has launched a pretty intense campaign to malign Signal as insecure
Comments ( https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40341716 )
https://twitter.com/matthew_d_green/status/1789687898863792453
if one things stinks, it´s Telegram telling others how insecure their tech is 💩
what gender was the AI?
