Avatar
Javier
f72e682e90cea98c66f57f69546d6350836cde78f5b8a0262767aaf6c51af867

One could say the 3rd dimension is a hell.

But what we did to deserve it?

Would you mind to please answer these two very important questions:

1. How do I declare to IRS the 400k sats I've won routing.

2. How to declare all the mess of my whirpool coinjoins? It's been thousands of tx and I don't want the gov to miss one single one.

I'm very worried that if I don't do any of the above properly, I could lose a lot of freedom and I could become a paria to my fellow statist fellowships.

Please, I beg you!! Help me!!! I'm anxious!!!

Think about it, it's an illusion. Limited gov is imposible because there is always going to be a large % of the population that would like oppression and slavery, which require taxes.

Only problem with this is that it always grows over time. Any single gov in existence always tend to socialism until full destruction. And full destruction can take 10 years or 300 hundred years like the Roman Empire took, but ultimately will happen.

It's better for us to understand that gov should die completely. "Limited" gov is an impossible paradox.

And not only that, they are also convincing them to not create families by gender ideology, so the state will be the next generation only family. Total dependency from the state so they can easily enslave everybody. Pure communism.

It's the same every cicle, new clueless people come and think naively about banks, govs, and exchanges, until they learn the hard way, which is usually losing all their money or freedom.

But they must understand, like we did, that Bitcoin is here to oppose those bad players, and any other way which doesn't imply full sovereignty of their coins is a very wrong way to use Bitcoin.

Bitcoin was not invented to satisfy nations. It was invented to destroy them. It is the only economic way out of the system. These noobs should understand and interiorize this, otherwise we are doomed.

Con nosotros lo intentaron en 1936 y fracasaron, pero desde 1982 sufrimos la "social democracia" que es lo mismo pero va destruyendo a cámara lenta el país.

Can I declare and pay my taxes with lightspark?

functional languages achieve much of this at the expense of massive amounts of memory copying, and if you add concurrency to the features, because there is good reasons to, you wind up with a problem that most of the time you should be using pointers and mutexes

and this doubly applies to the compiler itself, as with most languages, the compiler is written in the language itself, via a "bootstrap" method, i have seen haskell compilations OOM kill almost as often as i've seen badly written C++

compilation requires the use of massive tree structures and this combined with a pass by value policy leads to a LOT of garbage

and no, being a good programmer is only part of the story... if we were talking about carpentry, would you agree that frilly decorative crochet pieces around the tools are going to not impede with the work at hand?

that's how i see most of the languages...

i read python, so much repetition, such a poor visual impact of the general pattern of syntax

java, so many ridiculously long names and multi-hop paths due to the OOP... and C++ and javascript both also suffer from this extremely noisy visual aspect

in Go, you can often spot a bug just by that first momentary glance by the shape of the code

it is often tempting to forget to obey one of the first laws of go: fail fast - handle the error case before you handle success, and it always bites you on the arse, and this is an example of something that can be recognised instantly at a glance by the underscore where the programmer is pretending teh error case does not matter

it almost always matters, except in a few rare cases like running out of entropy

and yes, there is several critical parts of the Go standard library that push noisy, stuttering things on you like the context library, which is used to enable clean shutdown and timeouts of threads... not saying it's perfect, just that if you follow the rules in your code you less often have to go back and debug later on when things start going wrong

You probably haven't used much Clojure, Scala or Haskell (and Lisp, but this is dynamic), they use pointers internally for everything, while you have the impression they don't. And they are very well optimized. So it is not massive copying, it's just a bit, combined with pointer magic.

> and no, being a good programmer is only part of the story... if we were talking about carpentry, would you agree that frilly decorative crochet pieces around the tools are going to not impede with the work at hand?

Nice comparition, but I would rather compare C to a knife and Haskell to a full featured programmable electric saw. You can do the same with both, but with the knife you have to do it by hand, while with the electric saw you just have to introduce the parameters.

About Java, it's not the language itself the good part, but the JVM, or at least it was at my time, probably it is no longer the case.

Python is for doing 100 to 1000 lines scripts, I wouldn't make a full application on it.

And Go, I have no idea, I'm very old and I retired before it went mainstream.

Cuanto argentino y cuantos pocos españoles. Como se nota que estáis intentando superar el socialismo, en España nos queda todavía.

They are very busy on dumping the BTC that USA stoled and see if they can create a dip. But yes, this can be second in line.